The biggest problem in the last page or so is the reminder that Fuentes and Piker exist. Talk about two abject pieces of crap with outsized influence...Piker is a shit human being to say nothing of his garbage and hypocritical politics. Both "men" should be fired into the sun. Slowly.
Anyone following those two shitheads is basically a moron.
This whole war with Iran has me in a weird place both cheering it on and loathing its existence. It's ostensibly over a nuclear program we were told we'd obliterated a few months ago. Against an enemy that has probably directly or indirectly killed at least one American a year since about '79. We also have some pretty strong reporting that Israel extorted the US into attacking, so we have one of the most righteous wars in our history but for the wrong reasons.
I know from personal experience we knew of Iran's TBM and UAV threat at least back to 2014 or so (probably earlier). Yet, we always believed we could deal with them to a certain degree and I think the most recent shooting shows those estimates were wildly off the mark. Iran has done some serious damage to our air defenses in the region and that's not counting the missiles expended to intercept what was launched at us and our allies.
My penultimate thought: when are we going to seriously look at regime change because that is the ONLY way Iran ceases to be a threat? This limited strike nonsense is just that.
Anywho, y'all can argue over going to war or not, but I'd posit that both sides are right and both sides are wrong. This isn't "just" nukes and yet we distill every argument down to one topic? Nah.
ETA: typing fixes
Politicians shouldn't make promises they can't deliver on, especially when the results depend on someone else. Whether it's "free buses" from a mayor (which requires consent from the state, who isn't going to give it) or "no new wars" (the enemy always gets a vote), as a leader you shouldn't promise to do things for, or to, people when you don't have the power to do it.
But every politician (and many senior military leaders) do.
"Free buses and grocery stores!"
"I will release the Epstein files!"
"War will be over by Christmas."
"Two weeks to flatten the curve."
I understand why people, especially veterans, and especially-especially veterans with family members in the service, are upset about the war with Iran. Reasonable people can disagree. But I think this is a good decision. Iran hates America and has been actively working for years to attack our people and our interests. They regularly threaten US interest not only in the Persian Gulf region, not only in the Middle East, but around the world. They killed our people in Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. Their proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, attack US interests, our military, and global trade. Taking out Iran negatively affects both Russia and China, two enemies that really matter.
Iran's most useful weapons, both for offense and defense, are (were) their proxies. Those have been largely neutralized. Their rockets and drones are used, destroyed, or hidden away. Their navy is gone. Any goodwill from their neighbors is gone. Their internal politics is on fire. In my adult life, they have never been weaker than they are right now. If we really want to make meaningful change, it has to be now. I think in the long term this war will be good for America.