Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Marauder06, post: 484009, member: 19"] Interesting article. I admit to being skeptical, though. The article says: The first two pre-suppose that unintentional deaths, or even intentional ones, are de facto "morally injurious." Moreover, the term "injury" is problematic. An injury is a wound, or some type of harm. To me this seems like a setup to get more people on the "disabled" rolls. I think there is probably a better and more accurate term out there than "moral injury." [/QUOTE]