CSM Plumley's awards called into question.

Another example of some jack off, trying to get his 15 mins of fame, at the expense of someone who's no longer here and able to defend himself.
 
Such bullshit.

Descrepancies in the records are common from the 3 wars the CSM fought in. You had teenage admin clerks banging most of it out on typewriters, warehouses full of paperwork. When you unass the AO things get left behind.
 
I had all my awards stripped when I returned to Active Duty because the GS-dipshit running the awards section didn't know the rules. I spent a year rebuilding my records.
 
Is that 1 Combat Jump or 5 on his wings....?

Regardless, the SGM is a legend, and someone attacking a legend because of a DD214 that is wrong, or some jacked up paperwork is silly!

I hope Sam Elliot hunts this guy down and craps on his yard...in front of his grandma....during summer!

O_o
 
Is that 1 Combat Jump or 5 on his wings....?

Regardless, the SGM is a legend, and someone attacking a legend because of a DD214 that is wrong, or some jacked up paperwork is silly!

I hope Sam Elliot hunts this guy down and craps on his yard...in front of his grandma....during summer!

O_o

He had 5 combat jumps, Sicily, Normandy, Market-Garden, all the big ones. And he carried his balls in a wheelbarrow.
 
Mr. Siddall and AHRC should be advised that reports on research should not include obtusely derogatory statements ("...that wasn't enough for someone like Plumley. Plumley had to build himself up even more.") or defamatory labels like "disgusting."

Doing so points to an obvious agenda.

Military.com Article
 
Last edited:
Back
Top