New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Remrem, post: 23277"] I think the application is sort of an MP5 that's got more knockdown and the 45's subsonic velocity,which is a plus in situations where silenced is nessecery. Maybe a major city Tac squad would use a few rather as they'd use an MP5. Generally,police don't do "full auto" much,and lean to ammo that's either precise or is limited range. Military, the core concept answers a need..or sure aims to. The MP5 has some advantages in urban situations and covert but it has the limitations of a middleweight 9 mm round. i like the layout,ergonomics of the FN-P90, though I have never had the chance to use one. The way it's very compact without stuff sticking out to snag or get bent can be good in close quarters,or even for airborne. It's small bullet has some velocity-not much mass. Could the principles of the Kriss and the P 90 be blended somewhat? I assume the core concept of the Kriss weapon won't ever allow a real compact package but I think that a "next gen" version probably gets a bit streamlined and is a bit more compact. I think the concept of less recoil + climb might even become the base for a future SAW type of gun. Complexity, cost of production and maintainance....might be limiting. Bootstrap, Does your's seem like it's to complex to be adapted to a general combat role? I did see the demo on Future Weapons and I don't think he intended to do a tight group..rather wanted to punch a lot of big holes fast to show raw firepower. At another point he was demonstrating relative accuracy. Domestic police are not handing out full auto anything for everyday use. For the military, the trend now is away from massive forces,numerically and there may be a shift away from a One Size Fits All. [/QUOTE]

Verification: How many letters are in "ShadowSpear?"