@Diamondback 2/2 - regarding the Bergdahl protest and the Sgt. Major - I believed it back when it happened, and I believe it now. That Marine knew exactly what he was doing, and until someone shows me the part of the video leading up to the confrontation, I am going to be satisfied believing that the younger Marine purposefully got the reaction and outcome he had hoped for.
Link to the original Shadowspear conversation
All that said, if the person going after Clinton was the same person, (Ethan Arguello), he is no longer on active duty, and his Facebook page has been locked down. The whole 3% thing does pop up when you Google his name though. What is most interesting to me is that I have not yet seen a publicly released name from the Clinton debacle; I'd think if that was Arguello, (or whomever), he'd be everywhere he could be trying to get some media attention for himself.
I think you are making a pretty big assumption on the hat and SgtMaj video. You say unless you see video leading up to the incident you will "believe" what you believe. That's fine, but without any evidence to support your own beliefs of the situation it becomes moot. I was speaking to base point, the Bergdhal swap was BS and should have been protested by anyone who served in the GWOT, so I respect that this Marine did so. The SgtMaj should have never stop his vehicle and just drove to work, or the golf course, or whatever SgtMaj do when not inspecting troop, telling people to get off the grass, etc (that's a joke). But if the SgtMaj would've stayed on point and left this former Marine alone, that Marine would have never been able to bait him, would he not? So in that regards, its moot, SgtMaj fucked up, he owned up to it and retired.
The Clinton video, my point is that regardless that the Marine showed up to make a statement and put Slick Willy on the spot. He was boo'd by the crowd and told to shut up by a former president, trying to state what we all want to. I think that is commendable on this Marines veterans part, and despicable on Bill Clinton's part and shameful on the crowds part.
The problem is you, like me, are wired to respect practice's and policies (written or not) and our reaction when others do not, is to condemn their actions. Although in many cases it's properly placed (like the Marine being a cunt for disrespecting the Smokey bear), it tends to over shadow the overall message, that we (well 99% of us) agree with. Clinton family is corrupt, untrustworthy and horrible leaders (they claim to be leaders anyway) who have directly through lies and poor judgment and criminal actions, caused the death of our brothers and sisters in arms.
But anyway, we can agree to disagree if need be, I just wasn't sure if I was being clear on my position. As for the 3% stuff, I've got no idea what that's about and I will need to research it before I comment or give opinions on it.
$.02