THE IRISH VOLUNTEERS- FIGHTING 69TH

A northern propaganda song, written in New York during the civil war. Conveniently omitting the numerous Irish units of the Confederacy.
Obviously during McClellan's command of the Union Army (and I agree with @Red Flag 1, I nor others thought much of McClellan).
 
I was in the Fighting 69th for a few years. General Dempsey has attended a few St Patrick's Day functions in which the 69th leads the city's parade each year. Here he is signing The Fighting 69th (I was in the crowd and it was a hell of a good day!).

 
The geek in me was curious and tried to look up their casualty rates. I found as high as ~40% during Gettysburgh and 38% for Fredricksburg (specifically Marye's Heights).

Numbers in the link below have the Irish Brigade's losses at 12%.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/the-fighting-irish-brigade/?_r=0

This one says the 69th suffered 17.1% casualties ranking it 7th among Union regiments.

Fox's Regimental Losses, Chapter 1

A brief rundown of the Brigade's casualties:
http://www.civilwarhome.com/irishbri.html

Confederate regimental casualties were much higher.

Given the losses of similar non-Irish Union brigades (+80% in some battles) I'd think any talk of them used as cannon-fodder (not here, but I've seen it elsewhere) is more propaganda than fact. Horrific losses to be sure, but sadly not unusual for that war.
 
The geek in me was curious and tried to look up their casualty rates. I found as high as ~40% during Gettysburgh and 38% for Fredricksburg (specifically Marye's Heights).

Numbers in the link below have the Irish Brigade's losses at 12%.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/the-fighting-irish-brigade/?_r=0

This one says the 69th suffered 17.1% casualties ranking it 7th among Union regiments.

Fox's Regimental Losses, Chapter 1

A brief rundown of the Brigade's casualties:
The Irish Brigade

Confederate regimental casualties were much higher.

Given the losses of similar non-Irish Union brigades (+80% in some battles) I'd think any talk of them used as cannon-fodder (not here, but I've seen it elsewhere) is more propaganda than fact. Horrific losses to be sure, but sadly not unusual for that war.

I concur with the "cannon-fodder" ideation, that was rampant on both sides of the conflict. Irish casualities may have been seen as, well...blunting the number of losses; if you will.
 
Back
Top