...he dug his own grave. There is a way to disagree with a boss and he didn't exactly go about it the right way...
I wasn't in that COC to read the body language, but from what I gather - you're right. Fred is many things, but keeping the boss happy (especially if the boss is weak, or wrong) doesn't seem to be one of them. To me though, the issue isn't his political failings, but the fact that we are even talking about his political failings. The fact that there is such a thing as political failings in the career of a military officer.
I am no longer so naive as to imagine that we can have some pure organization untainted by human failings. The Marine Corps is a huge organization. It is a huge bureaucracy; there is no way around that, and it brings with it certain organizational incentives, impulses, and trends. I think that we should fight to stymie those that take the organization away from its core warfighting mission. Instead, it seems like most of our leadership, enlisted and officers (especially after a certain point) have embraced the bureaucratic aspects leading to a feedback loop known as the self-licking ice cream cone:
-General Officers whose well know motto is "It's not about the money. It's ALL about the money."
-MEU CO's sitting in a room having a talk specifically about Marine Corps / MEU relevancy saying (about MEU - SOF integration) "F@ck those c@ocks@uckers! I don't need some guy coming on MY boat and telling me what to do with MY Marines."
-Or later (same conference as the above quote) something along the lines of (regarding a brief on a certain unit's VBSS capabilities) "I don't see what the big deal is. Every one of my rifle companies can do the same thing."
-A Recon Bn BC and SMaj writing each other bronze stars for: "fearlessly traversing the battlespace".
-BC's inflating enemy KIA. This guy was obviously more concerned with the metrics than he was with us. Guys like him and Homiak were just using their unit (and men) to essentially pad their resumes and try to make a name for themselves.
-All of the above, and far more than is on the top of my head in the morning, are examples of what is systematically produced. They are not aberrations, they are the rule.
Sir, guys like yourself and several (but not
that many) other officers I have known are the exceptions that prove the rule. Men who have served under you, even for the briefest time, will remember you their entire lives. You stand out because you are literally exceptional. I don't know if it is something that is progressively stripped from most officers as they advance, or if it is selected against. Most of the junior officers I worked with in the Recon community were solid guys. Hopefully enough of you stick around (and learn politics better than some) to actually make a change.
-B&S