This was posted on Military.com and I plan to read it, because it seems an interesting read (the paper that is) however I'm sure it will mean more to you experts than it will to me. So I figured I'd post it if y'all aren't familiar with the paper.
Here is the link to the Military.com article references the paper and below is the link to the paper.
http://www.military.com/news/article/army-paper-prompts-look-at-combat-gear.html
http://www.scribd.com/full/27765477?access_key=key-25o3hl0i8xdi4f5zo2tb
Here is the link to the Military.com article references the paper and below is the link to the paper.
http://www.military.com/news/article/army-paper-prompts-look-at-combat-gear.html
http://www.scribd.com/full/27765477?access_key=key-25o3hl0i8xdi4f5zo2tb
Army Paper Prompts Look at Combat Gear
March 03, 2010
Military.com|by Christian Lowe
An obscure graduate school paper by an Army major that took the service to task over poorly training and equipping Soldiers for the fight in Afghanistan is causing quite a stir amid key service officials.
Special Operations Command has been picking the paper's conclusions apart with a fine-tooth comb. It is now required reading for Army weapons experts, and the service's top gear buyer has read it cover-to-cover.
But the paper's conclusions are causing some heartburn.
"I've read it. It's a very good paper. But he did take things out of context in a couple of places," said Col. Doug Tamilio, program manager for Soldier weapons. "He makes some conclusions that aren't substantiated with the documents he's got."
In a monograph titled "Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half Kilometer," Maj. Thomas Ehrhart, an infantry officer attending the elite Army School for Advanced Military Studies at Fort Leavenworth, wrote that the Army undertrained and underequipped its front-line units to battle insurgent forces over long ranges in mountainous terrain..............