An excellent read. It's Canadian and the resources listed are Canadian but the article is relevant to many of us.
Behind the Uniform: When struck by moral injury
- Thread starter RackMaster
- Start date
Interesting article. I admit to being skeptical, though. The article says:
The first two pre-suppose that unintentional deaths, or even intentional ones, are de facto "morally injurious." Moreover, the term "injury" is problematic. An injury is a wound, or some type of harm. To me this seems like a setup to get more people on the "disabled" rolls. I think there is probably a better and more accurate term out there than "moral injury."
The first two pre-suppose that unintentional deaths, or even intentional ones, are de facto "morally injurious." Moreover, the term "injury" is problematic. An injury is a wound, or some type of harm. To me this seems like a setup to get more people on the "disabled" rolls. I think there is probably a better and more accurate term out there than "moral injury."
Last edited:
Is this the veterans version of triggered?
Sometime between WWI and WWII, or perhaps after, there used to be a joke about military leadership in France, defined as the successful application of one's suicidal instincts unto others. It was funny and self-defeating at the same time.
There's a lot of use of injury up here. We typically don't use PTSD as a blanket description, since there's so many different flavours and combinations of mental health diagnosis. We use Operational Stress Injury to encompass everything. I think the intention is to cut back on comparing diagnosis and that it can be healed.
How about just "operational stress" or "emotional distress?" Is there some benefit to calling it an "injury?"
I believe they are using the term to try and be politically correct.
Way above my pay grade.
Red Flag 1
Verified Military
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2010
- Messages
- 7,587
.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 11415
Guest
Moral injury, PTS and TBI is the trifecta of Satan's asshole, imo. I found a therapist who works directly from St. Augustine's writing to treat moral injury.
She's 65, loves Krav Maga and previously affiliated with SWCS. She has my ear.
My takeaway is that "Privation of good" and "exposure to evil, not abuse" are two recurring topics and required elements in moral injury.
She is clear that "privation of good" and "exposure to evil, not abuse" doesn't apply to people who are true psychopaths or sociopaths-- but absolutely applies to the vast majority of war fighters and first responders, because the occupations require emotional paralysis in order to operate.
My take is that moral injury creates an injury of the soul, which can leave what feels and appears to an empty hole, afterwards. Augustine says that it's not empty, in the hole in your soul, it's just pitch black. Exposure to evil is the shade, and the sun is a person's soul.
When the sun is obscured from view, it's still there. When a non-sociopath is exposed to evil, it creates a hole that isn't empty, but it feel like it. The hole is dark for the same reason the ground is dark by a tree in the hot sun. The sun is still there, but tree obscures it, and there's a shadow, so it's dark and cool.
A lot of this is way over my head, honestly. I have zero interest in philosophy. But seeing the "moral injury therapist woman" isn't making anything worse, so that is of value to me.
She's 65, loves Krav Maga and previously affiliated with SWCS. She has my ear.
My takeaway is that "Privation of good" and "exposure to evil, not abuse" are two recurring topics and required elements in moral injury.
She is clear that "privation of good" and "exposure to evil, not abuse" doesn't apply to people who are true psychopaths or sociopaths-- but absolutely applies to the vast majority of war fighters and first responders, because the occupations require emotional paralysis in order to operate.
My take is that moral injury creates an injury of the soul, which can leave what feels and appears to an empty hole, afterwards. Augustine says that it's not empty, in the hole in your soul, it's just pitch black. Exposure to evil is the shade, and the sun is a person's soul.
When the sun is obscured from view, it's still there. When a non-sociopath is exposed to evil, it creates a hole that isn't empty, but it feel like it. The hole is dark for the same reason the ground is dark by a tree in the hot sun. The sun is still there, but tree obscures it, and there's a shadow, so it's dark and cool.
A lot of this is way over my head, honestly. I have zero interest in philosophy. But seeing the "moral injury therapist woman" isn't making anything worse, so that is of value to me.
To the extent the term injury reflects an incapacitation, rather than a level of "difficulty" or strain, I would say it's more accurate.
My two pennies.
One for each eye.
Very well put.
Serenity
Unverified
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
- Messages
- 89
I think 'moral injury' sounds like a good term, but I was diasappointed with the article. It felt like it lacked depth over something that needs to be carefully defined, and is instead a catch all that could cover anything. So interesting concept but fluffy for me. As a civilian, I didn't get much from it tbh. I was hoping for more... 
D
Deleted member 11415
Guest
Thank you. Its a goddamn shock that I made it through that entire thing without using "fuck" 18 times... I'm totally disappointed in myself.
