Brigitte Gabriel for the Win
- Thread starter Etype
- Start date
The Left disputes the 15-25% figure.
They say there's a difference between violent Muslim extremists and non-violent Muslim radicals; so therefore, they say, the non-violent but radical Muslims should not count. In my mind, non-violent Muslims who aid and abet the violent factions through deeds or financial contributions or even words, comprise the support side of the Jihadist movement and must be counted at least as facilitators.
They say there's a difference between violent Muslim extremists and non-violent Muslim radicals; so therefore, they say, the non-violent but radical Muslims should not count. In my mind, non-violent Muslims who aid and abet the violent factions through deeds or financial contributions or even words, comprise the support side of the Jihadist movement and must be counted at least as facilitators.
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2010
- Messages
- 2,186
@Ocoka One , it's like arguing that only the guerillas are part of the insurgency, and that the auxiliary support is innocent.
There are an estimated 1.7-billion Muslims. Just 1% of 1.7-billion is 17-million. If just 1% of Muslims are extremists, we have 17-million enemies. If it's 15 to 25%, we better keep making bullets.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2010
- Messages
- 2,186
I don't know if the stats are floating around, but I bet it's upwards of 100 rounds per EKIA in recent conflict.
This sounds like it's going to be expensive.
I think in my war it was something like 500 per. At least we're getting to be better shots.
