Looks good, the pistol grip is interesting. Would you recommend one?
Let's see that shooter
- Thread starter HOLLiS
- Start date
I've got one on my AR, works fine and looks cool but I'd like to have something that fits my hand a little better.
It's a Pachmeyer AR-15 grip. Designed and manufactured for AR's, although it holds obvious heritage with the revolver grips they have done in the past.
Yes.
As above, Pachmeyer. I prefer it to plain jane AR grips. I used to have them on my work M4 for quite some time, and now it's just on the house gun.
Well I'll be, I like the grip on hand cannons as I have man fingers and find it fills my hand out better. Didn't know they were making AR grips with them though.
Pachmeyer, that's right. Not Hogue.
Where did you get your redi-mag? I'm planning on picking one up soon.
pardus
Verified Military
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,534
OK just seen on another post that you have a TR22-1 2.5-10
Why did you go with something that has 10 power on an AR? I'm curious.
The redimag I purchased locally many many moons ago if I remember correctly. I have had this rifle since '06 thereabouts and basically had it set up as you see it minus glass in the same day I bought it. I don't know if pachmeyer is still making the grips though, but if they aren't I think I have a spare one I used to have mounted to my work rifle.
As for the magnification range of the scope?
Original intent was that it would be an interim optic, to be removed and placed on the 7.62 platforms I'm getting for myself and the missus. While looking at them, it was CHEAPER for me to get an accupoint 2.5-10x56, than it was to get the 1-4x accupoint, or any acog variant.
Now? I'll just be buying two more of them. I basically "grew up" with Trijicon. Easily 3/4 of the time I was in Regiment I had an ACOG so I'm both pretty well used to doing CQM stuff with magnification, as well as a large proponent of being able to see further than the other guy.
As for the magnification range of the scope?
Original intent was that it would be an interim optic, to be removed and placed on the 7.62 platforms I'm getting for myself and the missus. While looking at them, it was CHEAPER for me to get an accupoint 2.5-10x56, than it was to get the 1-4x accupoint, or any acog variant.
Now? I'll just be buying two more of them. I basically "grew up" with Trijicon. Easily 3/4 of the time I was in Regiment I had an ACOG so I'm both pretty well used to doing CQM stuff with magnification, as well as a large proponent of being able to see further than the other guy.
pardus
Verified Military
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 10,534
I'm no expert but the M14 is the Military selective fire model, and the M1A is the semi auto civilian model.
HOLLiS
Verified Military
M14 could go either way, like the military M1 30 cal carbine, it takes a few special parts and then you have select fire. The ones we had in boot camp where semi only. There are some like that floating around in the civilian world, like the M1 carbines. The M1A are made in so those special parts will not work. I would say that the odds are real good if it is a semi auto, it is as Pardus says.
The one in the photo looks like a M14 with select fire.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 202
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 202
I think they call this one the Mil Scale GAP
HOLLiS
Verified Military
If it is expensive it got to be complicated. I like mil dot scopes. Not sure why, but they sound really cool.
I have a few on some of rifles. On my .338, zero is at 200M, each dot is 100M. So it is GTG to 600M.
I have a few on some of rifles. On my .338, zero is at 200M, each dot is 100M. So it is GTG to 600M.
Um, I know what you can send me for my birthday... that would be SWEET on the Win Model 70 Featherweight .308 (1956 build)
oh yeah, my thoughts on scoping that M1/M14... it would be like scoping my FN/FAL, expensive to complete and worthless for the value of the rifle unless you took it to the old sniper setup and finding a Zeiss 30x 45mm milspec passive IR scope would be tough. The M1/M14 is a tack driver with irons IMHO.
Nice! Did you get your spare parts yet?
You suck !!
I've owned one other Wilson Combat 1911 and it never needed anything but new recoil springs after 3,000 rounds. Right up until I fucked it up with a dremel tool
Edited for brevity and accuracy
,
.
.
.
.
.
I would give a kidney for a US Optics scope... SWEEEET!
Similar threads
