http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/na...oct18,0,3948586.story?coll=bal-iraq-headlines
This is a followup to the thread that Free started here
So, there's an MI O6 Brigade Commander on site, and a CA O5, and there's any question at all who's in charge of the Detention and Interrogation Facility? Seems like there ought to be a piece of paper with somebody's name on it somewhere. I wonder what the duty descriptions on their respective OERs say for the time period in question?
The Army granted Pappas immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony against Jordan, a lower-ranking officer. Pappas was fined $8,000 and given a letter of reprimand for allowing military intelligence officers under his command to use dogs improperly.
That sound kind of odd, ordinarily I'd expect to see the lower-ranking offered immunity so the prosecutors could go after the bigger fish. Why do you think they're going after Jordan in this case instead of Pappas?
This is a followup to the thread that Free started here
So, there's an MI O6 Brigade Commander on site, and a CA O5, and there's any question at all who's in charge of the Detention and Interrogation Facility? Seems like there ought to be a piece of paper with somebody's name on it somewhere. I wonder what the duty descriptions on their respective OERs say for the time period in question?
The Army granted Pappas immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony against Jordan, a lower-ranking officer. Pappas was fined $8,000 and given a letter of reprimand for allowing military intelligence officers under his command to use dogs improperly.
That sound kind of odd, ordinarily I'd expect to see the lower-ranking offered immunity so the prosecutors could go after the bigger fish. Why do you think they're going after Jordan in this case instead of Pappas?
