I know WND is somewhat biased, but I first saw this story on CNN and the facts aren't disputed. A firearm owner lent his AR-15 to someone for target practice. While at the range the weapon fired a burst. Despite no modification to the rifle, and one subject to a recall at that, the owner was convicted of, drum roll please, "Unlawful transfer of a machinegun."
The problem with all of this is now the BATF can classify your stock AR-15 as a "machine gun" if it misfires. With the assault weapons ban coming up to a vote it will be interesting to see if this case plays a roll in that.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=68590
The problem with all of this is now the BATF can classify your stock AR-15 as a "machine gun" if it misfires. With the assault weapons ban coming up to a vote it will be interesting to see if this case plays a roll in that.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=68590
A Wisconsin man today surrendered to federal authorities to begin serving a 30-month prison term for having a broken rifle, prompting the Gun Owners of America to issue a warning about the owner's liability should any semi-automatic weapon ever misfire.
"A gun that malfunctions is not a machine gun," Larry Pratt, executive director of GOA, said. "What the [federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives] has done in the [David] Olofson case has set a precedent that could make any of the millions of Americans that own semi-automatic firearms suddenly the owner [of] an unregistered machine gun at the moment the gun malfunctions."