Plagiarized War College Thesis

Scotth

Verified Military
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
1,496
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Newly appointed (D) Senator from Montana John Walsh plagiarized about 1/3 of his final War College Thesis without citation. The other 2/3 was mostly copied from other sources but at lease he had foot notes attributing the source even if he didn't use quotations to designate what was directly copied from other source.

Basically, he cut-n-pasted his final thesis and now the War College will investigate and hopefully rescind his Master Degree they awarded him.

That should ruin his military career but who knows about his political career. He should drop out of the race out of pride but I'm not counting on that.
 
Last edited:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...ably_just_ended_a_senate_race_in_montana.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/us/politics/montana-senator-john-walsh-plagiarized-thesis.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...hints_ptsd_influenced_plagiarism_of_work.html

I recommend these three articles, in order of precedence. The New York Times article is most damaging. It has a graphic showing the paper, highlighting the portions that had no documentation or improper documentation. The Reader's Digest version: the only portions not highlighted is the title page and the reference page.

Another unfortunate example that leaders can use as a teaching point to younger soldiers. Tragic. I'm writing a letter to one of my grad school professors right now. I'll post a redacted version later.
 
That New York Times graphic is damning in the most concise way possible.

Montana's Democrats are fools if they don't demand that he step down immediately.

The War College is a major career milestone for an officer and that is the kind of work you offer. Unbelievable.
 
Here is my e-mail to my Professor.

Dr. {name- redacted},
The points that you and {name- redacted} University make about plagiarism ring true. Sadly, those points are backed by unfortunate examples. This is tragic on so many levels. A former Adjutant General from the Montana state National Guard and current serving US Senator plagiarized his Army War College paper. Here are links to various articles about it. The links are in order of precedence.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...ably_just_ended_a_senate_race_in_montana.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/us/politics/montana-senator-john-walsh-plagiarized-thesis.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...hints_ptsd_influenced_plagiarism_of_work.html

Most damaging are the articles from SLATE.com and the New York Times. The New York Times has the entire paper highlighted with sections where improper or no documentation was used. It is absolutely sickening to look at it.

As I said early, the tragedy of this extends to many things. First, this besmirches the Army Officer Corps and the Officer Education System. He was conferred a Master’s Degree in 2007 with that paper. I know there were various anti-plagiarism websites available back then to prevent this activity. Second, the Senator responds with his mental state at the time. It is true that many Soldiers suffer from post-traumatic stress, possibly many more than the population at large realizes. Many veterans go to counseling, receive medication, or get help in various, legal ways. Empathy with his medical struggles is not hard but the Senator damages the reputation of all veterans who willingly suffer through post-traumatic stress while making the right decisions in their personal and professional lives. Using PTSD and medication as an excuse diminishes the seriousness of the issue at hand. Third, the Senator’s office continues to respond with encores of his military service. Embarrassment ensues; no one is questioning his military service but rather his character and integrity. Here is where it gets worse: the United States Army Officer Corps and Education System are supposed to prevent incidents such as this. Independent fact-checking should not have outed this paper. We are supposed to police our profession, help those that seek help, and not embarrass ourselves. We have an entire system that confers Masters degrees to Officer’s in the rank of Major and above (all officers above age of 30). Furthermore, these Masters Degrees help officers advance in rank and responsibility. The Army War College is reserved for officers at the rank of Colonel who are more than likely going to proceed to General Officer ranks and have a strategic impact on the force. The instructors at the War College are retired or active duty Colonels, General Officers, and civilian professionals with PhDs. The Senator’s incident puts the entire Officer Education System under a negative microscope. No wonder Masters degrees from military institutes do not hold a candle to civilian degrees. Do you find that to be the case in your experience Dr. {name- redacted}?

I am preparing for advanced military schooling in {dates-redacted} and the biggest point made by {names-redacted} and my peers is to gain a degree that has civilian accreditation (Naval Post Graduate School is one, National Defense University another) or take night classes for an MBA/MPA rather than work towards a Military Masters of Strategic Studies (or something of that ilk). Something is egregiously wrong with the military profession when we cannot tout our educational standards and degrees as coming close to those of at least the Ivy League. {anecdote-redacted}.

{Personal opinion-redacted}...thesis papers from the Naval Post Graduate School are anywhere between 30-50 pages in length, the students writing them are in their early 30’s with about half as much time in service as the Senator, and the topics are of a strategic nature. As an institution putting the finishing touches on strategic practitioners before they lead thousands of soldiers into dangerous lands, I assess the Army War College can and should do better to control quality. {personal natue-redacted}, I am going to use this incident as a teaching point for my soldiers, {personal nature- redacted}.

Thank you for listening Dr. {redacted}. I hope you are doing well.

V/R,
Viper1
 
Geez. The entire paper was written nearly verbatim?! Academic integrity at it's finest right there...

Interesting coincidence on the timing of this story as I just happened to read through policies last night as part of a SOS DL course. Academic integrity is described at length in at least 3 separate policy docs; you're clearly put on notice. As an example, AUI36-2609, one of the governing docs, states very clearly that such integrity issues are a violation of Articles 92 and/or 134, UCMJ and describes potential outcomes for violations. If a violation is discovered after completion of the course, the diploma can be redacted; virtually a given in this case, I presume.

SOC uses a tool called SafeAssign to review student submissions and identify potential problems with citations. I guess when he submitted his paper in 2007 a similar tool wasn't available or in use by the Army? If so, how did they miss this one - the links posted by Viper1 are pretty damning. What's more is that it seems like we hear about similar high profile cases like this every couple years. Are there no lessons being learned?
 
Last edited:
In her reply, my professor cautioned that plagiarism allegations are serious and investigations must "go deep." A paper written in 2007 but put through an electronic search engine might bring up false positives. Someone should actually pull the references cited and go through line by line. An arduous task indeed. Still, the initial evidence is pretty damning, and the Army War College is investigating according to military.com
 
I believe there have been 4-6 diploma's revoked in the last 10 years, so it's not as common as some will say.

I can tell ya as the spouse of a War College grad that I can't believe he didn't have anyone check his work. I read every paper she submitted for clarity, and I looked up all here referenced sources to ensure they were properly used.
K's classmates had the same safety net (spouse, family member, co-worker, friend, etc).

They are also taking a hard look at his original degree.

I LOL at everyone tossing his BSM out as proof of his Military Skills, he was what; LTC? COL? when he was awarded his BSM? I'd be impressed if he was a CPT or LT.
 
Well, reading comments on the MT newspapers sites on this topic indicates the Montanans in general are not happy. The state may run blue but barely and it's the rather rare conservative blue. This may just be the tipping point for their future.

The previous Dem governor could only manage a win by splitting the ticket and utilizing a Republican for Lieutenant Governor.

LL
 
I read his thesis, and it looks like complete crap. A master's thesis... for the War College... and it's only 14 double-spaced pages? Seriously?

For purposes of comparison, one of the classes I teach at West Point, the introductory to International Relations class that EVERY cadet has to take to graduate, has a requirement of 15 pages. That's a core course in an undergrad program. My first master's thesis was at least 40 pages, the one I did at NDIC was more than 100 pages (IIRC), and at Yale we didn't even have a thesis requirement but we still had to do at least one paper of at least 25 pages.

The only reason this clown even got 14 pages was through the gratuitous use of lengthy and useless quotes. Combine that with the rampant plagiarism and this is something that took, at most, one night and a pint of Jim Beam to knock out.

I'm embarrassed for the War College that this is what they think passes for graduate-level scholarship.

lol...one of the posts said "Plagrism Theft And Stealing Disorder?"

hmmmm....
 
KNOW honor -- NO cheating....

NO honor -- KNOW cheating....

It's truly sad that he didn't have enough honor and integrity to do what was right and do his own work. Cheat your way through one thing and you become prone to cheating your way through everything.

Those are things you don't do when you are in positions of leadership.

Truly sad!
 
I'm embarrassed for the War College that this is what they think passes for graduate-level scholarship.

While I obviously whole heartily agree with everything else you said, I believe your final point is worth mentioning again.

Hopefully, if the War College takes this black eye in the right way, it will be a wake up call and a teaching moment for them as well.
 
Back
Top