Good Afternoon,
First off, if this is in the wrong board I apologize. Please move it to the correct board.
I have been dealing with tattoo issues with the Marine Corps for two years now. I had a tattoo on my collarbone that was disqualifying due to its placement (considered neck under policy). We put in a waiver for it and it got denied.
I proceeded to get this specific tattoo lasered off, and it is no longer there. According to policy, any previous tattoos that have since been removed must be documented via waiver. We put in another waiver package and this time it got denied. My OSO told me this:
- They don't like the tattoo on your forearm so they denied it
- A new tattoo policy is coming out soon and they want all waivers resubmitted when it comes out
The tattoo I have on my forearm can be completely covered by one hand (per policy). Of course, none of my tattoos are prejudicial to good order etc.
What I am asking is in your opinion, is my OSO blowing smoke and am I wasting my time? I am having a hard time understanding why they could deny my tattoo waiver on account of another tattoo that is within policy. On his part, those statements seem to be contradictory. I want to know if I should start considering other ways to serve my country.
Respectfully,
Kevin B.
First off, if this is in the wrong board I apologize. Please move it to the correct board.
I have been dealing with tattoo issues with the Marine Corps for two years now. I had a tattoo on my collarbone that was disqualifying due to its placement (considered neck under policy). We put in a waiver for it and it got denied.
I proceeded to get this specific tattoo lasered off, and it is no longer there. According to policy, any previous tattoos that have since been removed must be documented via waiver. We put in another waiver package and this time it got denied. My OSO told me this:
- They don't like the tattoo on your forearm so they denied it
- A new tattoo policy is coming out soon and they want all waivers resubmitted when it comes out
The tattoo I have on my forearm can be completely covered by one hand (per policy). Of course, none of my tattoos are prejudicial to good order etc.
What I am asking is in your opinion, is my OSO blowing smoke and am I wasting my time? I am having a hard time understanding why they could deny my tattoo waiver on account of another tattoo that is within policy. On his part, those statements seem to be contradictory. I want to know if I should start considering other ways to serve my country.
Respectfully,
Kevin B.