I apologize in advance, both for necro-bumping a five-month old thread, and for writing a manifesto.
I just hit the point in my career where I now have exactly 10.5 years active Army time and 10.5 years Guard time, and I like to believe I have a certain perspective regarding the differences.
What to does active military memebers think of reserve and national guard?
I can tell you that from Group and BN Commanders all the way down to the 18X who just showed up on an ODA five minutes ago, they all believe that NGSF is less trained and experienced than their AC counterparts.
That is not to say less capable.
But take the story of two 18E's as an example:
They graduate SFQC on the same day in the summer of 1998 (pre-war). One is active duty, the other is NGSF. The AD 18E goes to Group and averages about 180 days a year away from home with team and company-level training with CONUS and OCONUS deployments, and schools. In between there are a few 3 or 4 day weekends and two weeks leave, and the rest of it provides plenty of opportunity for local training. But every year that 18E is working in his duty position roughly 240-270 duty days.
The 18E that went to NGSF will get somewhere between 40-90 duty days a year actually working in his duty position, depending on whether or not he got a school AND was on a JCET that year.
All things being equal, that active duty 18E had about 385% more opportunities to become proficient in his duty position than the Guard 18E that year. Of course it is also a function of individual's motivation and aptitude, and that of his senior and TM SGT. But by the time the war started, that active duty 18E got to work and train in his duty position for as much as 810 days, the NGSF 18E got 210 days at most.
Now, NGSF companies are not entirely comprised of Guard soldiers who go to the Q, they can range from about 1/3 to over 1/2 prior active duty SF experience.
But even with that institutional knowledge, an NGSF soldier gets to work in his MOS 40-70 days a year while holding down a real job and/or school, and the active duty soldier gets to work on his MOS job every day. And that just aggregates out to an active component SF Company on the whole being more proficient than an NGSF Company on the whole.
That's not bias, that's just math.
CA did the same, but I think it was so bad, SOCOM ended up giving funds directly to the unit, and did not go through the State.
That's not really the case for several reasons. All the money that goes to Guard units is ostensibly under control of the USPFO and the G3 Budget section of each state. The unit can go so far as to have a program manager with approval level for their budget, but the TAG legally has the discretion to move budgets within his state as he sees fit. That said, CA has never had a problem with the state "stealing" money from SF, CA used to have a problem with how much money 19th would choose to disburse to 5th BN, and how much 5th BN would choose to disburse to the company in CA.
AGR and Technician jobs are a racket the mafia would envy.
It is a mafia in every state. Especially how the AGR 42A's look out for each other in assignments and promotion opportunities, both in their MOS and MOS-immaterial jobs. And when you add the problem of AGR Branch placing friends in duty positions that they clearly cannot handle, and compound that with units hiring their own AGRs off the street not based on competence but who is unemployed at the time, you end up with a weak system from CO, BN, BDE all the way up to JFHQ.
The CA AGR system is still suffering the endemic problems from decades of just that kind of mismanagement. But at least the new TAG came in firing the worst of the worst at the top, and has been using the ASMB for its intended purpose, cutting the dead weight that homesteads in one job and/or avoids deployment. But there's still a long way to go.
That being said, right now if you want to be a warrior and not just get educational benefits, the Active duty is the place to be.
That is what I have told everyone who has asked me about going SF since I got to the Guard. If you want to be SF, then you are going to get more out of it by doing it full time.
And if they truly want to be SF AND be whatever it is they have as a civilian career, I still recommend active first.
Because SFQC doesn't teach you the "job"; it teaches you the skills you must have to learn your job on the team. (And that pretty much describes most schools, mil and civ).
Based on my own observations (and the opininions of my team mates on active duty) it takes about that whole first year for the average Q course grad (officer or enlisted) to fully learn his job on the team and become truly proficient.
By that same token, it takes a the average Q course grad about 2-3 years in NGSF to get to that same point.