Bagram or Vance/Montrond? I need perspective here.But, hey, I'm just a pogue who carried a tray out of the Bagram DFAC. Your mileage may vary.
Bagram or Vance/Montrond? I need perspective here.But, hey, I'm just a pogue who carried a tray out of the Bagram DFAC. Your mileage may vary.
Bagram or Vance/Montrond? I need perspective here.
@SpongeBob*24 now we have an answer.
(We had a PM about Bagram DFACs and I couldn't remember the camp's name)
Vance...wasn't he a Guard 18E? And Montrond...7th Group? I used to read bios and could remember this stuff.
This already exists in the Marine Corps at most bases. I assume the Army has something similar. They support multiple weapon systems and have all sorts of scenarios. Good for individual training, not as good for unit training. ISMT We have one for supporting arms as well Supporting Arms Virtual TrainerIf I may, as a guy involved in training simulators.
Every December-ish Orlando hosts ITSEC.
I/ITSEC Homepage
I saw things there which kind of blew my mind. Sims for door gunners, medicine, C2, anti-tank, flight sims, etc. There was a sim that replicated the picture a gunner would see from the aft ramp of a CH-47. There was one for JTACs that used real world callsigns. As you can imagine, the small arms sims were amazing. Some of the vendors included Unreal Engine and Nvidia which are not scrub companies.
When you consider the training opportunities available such as dry fire, blanks, simunitions, and live fire, there's something to be said for modern digital sims.
The Navy is no shit using flight sims to qualify naval aviators, some of who NEVER set foot in their airframe until they reach an operational squadron within the fleet. I've seen this and I've spoken to the instructors.
If you can qualify aircrews, with their exceptionally rigid standards based upon digital learning alone, then ground forces can build a high level skillset before they squeeze a trigger with any munition. Blank, sim, live...doesn't matter.
I'm not saying this for professional or personal growth, but every branch can benefit from digital training across almost every MOS/ Rate/ AFSC.
Maybe some career fields need to start writing checks...
But, hey, I'm just a pogue who carried a tray out of the Bagram DFAC. Your mileage may vary.
This already exists in the Marine Corps at most bases. I assume the Army has something similar. They support multiple weapon systems and have all sorts of scenarios. Good for individual training, not as good for unit training. ISMT We have one for supporting arms as well Supporting Arms Virtual Trainer
But how much time is an individual soldier or Marine spending on those sims per year?
Regulars get a lot less range time than specials. Even in the year we went through two BDE certification exercises I might have spent a total of 12 days shooting at company level (this was the high for the squadron) and then add gunnery which was 20 days, we were supposed to do gunnery twice that year but got kaboshed by Brigade Modernization Command.But how much time is an individual soldier or Marine spending on those sims per year?
For the Marine Corps they are pretty well used to be honest. It’s an easy way to spend white space. We had one on our camp…I think most camps, which correlates to an infantry regiment with its 3-4 battalions, have one.But how much time is an individual soldier or Marine spending on those sims per year?
Strictly from the medical pov. Those VR goggles are the shit. I contributed to the Statement Of Work (SOW). On a version of these goggles that have a HUD in them. The Medic/Corpsman can scroll through a quick reference for treatments in the PCC/PFC stages. As well as transmitting back in realtime. To senior medical personal who can view what the Medic/Corpsman is seeing.Regarding naval student aviation, you're correct. Ward Carroll has a YouTube video on that subject, what they are doing is just incredible.
We use simulation extensively in medicine, especially for high risk / low volume events, and honestly there's a new product on the market every month it seems that just makes it more incredible, VR goggles, etc.
Absolutely! SOMSA 2023's exhibit hall had tables full of this type of equipment to display and demonstrate. One of the ones I used. Was just a set of goggles for a troop. That had different sensors in them That monitored the wearer's location and physiological data. So that the medical authority in a rear position. Has a realtime overview of an individual or team.VR is an adjunct in education, just another tool in the tool belt. Operationally we're seeing it with austere medicine with everyone in between "I'm just a medic, bro" to physicians. It's more and more commonplace.