A couple things:
How many rotations or how many months/years do you have working with a host/partner nation military/police force in an active combat zone where they are the main effort and you are there to support and advice them?
How much time do you have in Afghanistan, or Iraq, or any other third world shit hole conducting operations? It doesn't seem as though you have much if any given some of these questions/comments you are making.
Regardless, I will entertain your musings, within reason, as I have been in this situation a time or two...
...hey mate... common sense approach?.....let's try to analyze some still images...
Common sense approach in that we are letting them (ANA/ANP) take the lead in fighting for and dying for their own country's security. The other alternative is for us to continue to hold their hands and do what they should be doing...
The view from the helmet cam is very narrow, in that you cant see everything else that went on getting to the objective, why they are there, whether this was a follow-on/flex target, etc... It doesnt provide a good view of what was going on with respect to security covering the assault forces movement either.
1) the squad arrive to OBJ by car in broad daylight and stopped the car at 100 meters from the OBJ
And, your point? Quite often guys are forced to move distances, without cover, greater than they would like due to a berm, compound wall, fields, etc surrounding the TGT structure...
As for daylight vs. dark, again we dont know the details of why...
2) The OBJ is small, isolated and is located in open field, cover and concealment are difficult. The approach should be done very carefully because OBJ is occupied (there is a motorbike)
I agree that movement from the LCAC position shouldn't be taken lightly. Speed is security...
3) Operators meet the Principal Direction of Fire (PDF) during the approach
I would say you are assuming they couldn't be viewed from the other sides of the structure or that they had time to study the structure from multiple angles prior to moving on it. Most mud huts in Afghanistan, Iraq, countries in the horn of Africa, Lebanon, South American, Phillipines, etc... have holes in them from which people can peer out, on all sides, thus making approach from any direction open to view.
4) ...and when it's time to break-in, rifle is not in position.... (barrel down...)
I disagree.
The Afghani's rifle is in the position it should be, not flagging the guy in front of him. I dont know about you but I dont particularly like having a rifle pointed in my back (or any part of my body) especially when its a jundi holding the rifle. Your methods may vary, best of luck to you if you do allow it...
5) After break-in, first operator look on the right side not in front of him.... he will be lucky 1" after, in effect in front of him there is an insurgent....
First person in the door isnt an SF guy, its an ANA soldier (BTW, operators answer phones).
6) SureFire switch on.....
Not sure what point you are trying to make here...
7) with 2 potential insurgents in the room, without cover on the door, operator leaves his M4, raising his right hand...
Do you know who made entry into the structure behind the couple ANA and one SF soldier? Do you know who is securing the perimeter of the structure from the outside? If not you are again assuming.
Furthermore, and I return to question your experiences - how many Afghan villagers you have interacted with? I dont know any who understand spoken English commands. As such from time to time it requires hand and arm signals to get one's point across without physically moving people where you want them, which would also require removing a hand from the weapon. Giving hand signals is common when working in the places we work with those we work with and against.
Honestly I have nothing negative to say about it; I wasnt there and dont know the details that led to what we viewed on the cam.
I would admonish you to, when you dont know the details, avoid criticizing others actions based on the aforementioned lack of information needed to make such judgments. It is unprofessional and unproductive.
That said, you saw what its like on a day-to-day basis working with and fighting along side host/partner nation forces. Sometimes things go as planned other times not so much, but it is what it is... Doing this day-in/day-out isnt for everyone.