In all seriousness, are the Coriolis Effect and curvature of the earth that big of deal? That pretty much sounds like bullshit to me, so that's why I'm asking the question. I've heard both arguments.
Goddamn. That is ridiculously impressive.
ETA: The article says 3540 as opposed to 3450. So another 90m.
In all seriousness, are the Coriolis Effect and curvature of the earth that big of deal? That pretty much sounds like bullshit to me, so that's why I'm asking the question. I've heard both arguments.
The Globe and Mail is a Canadian mainstream news organization. Fox News has picked it up, as has BBC, NPR, and USA Today. So if it's bullshit, everyone has taken a bite.
<OohRah pauses to change into flame resistant suit >
.
<clears throat>
.
<Obligatory "with all respect to the OP and my Canadian friends to the north" statement...
.
View attachment 19009
Yeah so, I'm a cunt hair away from calling "clickbait" until I see an official statement from the Canadian military or government.
There has been a recent influx of "Heroic sniper makes this amazing shot...." stories, but there is rarely a name attached to it, none of the legit sites pick it up, and witnesses are usually unnamed sources.
Similar to these stories:
SAS sniper kills THREE ISIS fighters with a single shot | Daily Mail Online
SAS sniper kills ISIS executioner moments before he kills 12 hostages | Daily Mail Online
Until someone comes forward as a real person and attests to these feats, I am hard pressed to believe, and will continue to fall back on confirmed kills from the likes of Gunny Hathcock's 2500 yard Vietnam shot with a Browning M2 and the U.K.'s Craig Harrison's 2009 kill in Afghanistan. (2707 yards with .338 Lapua)
Are you saying it's possible the newspaper fabricated this out of thin air and is knowingly falsely claiming that it's been confirmed by the CAF?
"The Canadian Special Operations Command can confirm that a member of Joint Task Force 2 successfully hit a target at 3,540 metres," the forces said in a statement. "For operational security reasons and to preserve the safety of our personnel and our Coalition partners we will not discuss precise details on when and how this incident took place."
Nope. I'm saying that the past two years have caused me to further scrutinize 'news' and be much more skeptical; especially when the only sources are 'unnamed or anonymous' .
The OP's linked story has been updated a number of times and the military confirmation wasn't part of it originally. Glad to see that official confirmation...well done to the shooter!
I dunno why you guys are so surprised about this shot. I bet the shooter just had a really good cup of Timmys that morning.