policemedic
Verified SWAT
Red Flag 1 - Excellent idea in the other thread.
Since the topic is wide open, I'll start with this.
For clarity's sake, when I refer to nasal intubation I'm referring to the use of an endotracheal tube. I've had the dubious pleasure of allowing my paramedic students to insert nasopharyngeal airways, NG/OG tubes, and nasal ET tubes in me. I drew the line at being a test dummy for EJs .
As a result, it is my strong belief that where these procedures are concerned lube and anesthetics are your friends, but technique is everything. This is true especially when coaching a panicky patient through a nasal intubation.
I agree with the TC3 recommendations. Dedicating the time and personnel to perform orotracheal intubation in the first phases of TC3 is bad mojo.
In fact, I would argue that the training required to even become safe when managing the airway with an ET tube (A&P, cardiac/waveform ETCO2 monitoring [when available], video training, pharmacology, manikin training, simulator/cadaver/OR/ED tubes etc.) let alone skilled at the procedure requires such a commitment of resources and time that it should not be part of the average (and I stress average) 68W's toolkit. Laryngoscopy is not a benign procedure. The Big Army medic has other skills to manage the airway that are easier to develop and maintain clinical competency with. Training should be directed at sustaining those critical skills e.g. cut big or go home.
Now regarding blind awake nasal intubations, I used to do quite a few. The typical pt presented with an acute exacerbation of CHF. Nowadays, not so much. Other treatment modalities, particularly where CHF is concerned, are available that render nasal intubation a very low-frequency procedure. I still have a BAAM on my stethoscope, but some newer medics will occasionally ask why.
This should stir up enough controversy for now. :nerd:
Since the topic is wide open, I'll start with this.
As a medic we just use lube for nasal intubation. Not a pleasant feeling but not terrible either.
FYI, Army Medics no longer have oral intubation as an option during TC3. Nasal then a cric.
For clarity's sake, when I refer to nasal intubation I'm referring to the use of an endotracheal tube. I've had the dubious pleasure of allowing my paramedic students to insert nasopharyngeal airways, NG/OG tubes, and nasal ET tubes in me. I drew the line at being a test dummy for EJs .
As a result, it is my strong belief that where these procedures are concerned lube and anesthetics are your friends, but technique is everything. This is true especially when coaching a panicky patient through a nasal intubation.
I agree with the TC3 recommendations. Dedicating the time and personnel to perform orotracheal intubation in the first phases of TC3 is bad mojo.
In fact, I would argue that the training required to even become safe when managing the airway with an ET tube (A&P, cardiac/waveform ETCO2 monitoring [when available], video training, pharmacology, manikin training, simulator/cadaver/OR/ED tubes etc.) let alone skilled at the procedure requires such a commitment of resources and time that it should not be part of the average (and I stress average) 68W's toolkit. Laryngoscopy is not a benign procedure. The Big Army medic has other skills to manage the airway that are easier to develop and maintain clinical competency with. Training should be directed at sustaining those critical skills e.g. cut big or go home.
Now regarding blind awake nasal intubations, I used to do quite a few. The typical pt presented with an acute exacerbation of CHF. Nowadays, not so much. Other treatment modalities, particularly where CHF is concerned, are available that render nasal intubation a very low-frequency procedure. I still have a BAAM on my stethoscope, but some newer medics will occasionally ask why.
This should stir up enough controversy for now. :nerd: