Pakistan: "NATO needs to do more to reduce terrorist sanctuaries..."

Marauder06

Intel Enabler
Verified SOF
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
10,724
Location
CONUS
"...inside Afghanistan.

bwahahahahaha, good one Pakistan.

Pakistan has criticized NATO and Afghan forces for not doing enough to stop the attacks,
O_o

Yep, the only way you're going to be able to do that is to invade and occupy parts of western Afghanistan. I guess we better get on that. Maybe we can take that billion dollars in bribes... I mean "foreign aid" that we're giving Pakistan to pacify their country, and just do it for them. :rolleyes:

but it has received little sympathy. The Afghan government and its allies have long faulted Pakistan for failing to target Afghan Taliban militants and their allies who use Pakistani territory to launch attacks in Afghanistan.

http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_new...ase-video-of-beheaded-pakistani-soldiers?lite
 

AWP

Formerly Known as Freefalling
SOF Support
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
15,914
Location
Not Afghanistan
Does anyone take PK seriously any more? Every thing from that country is one big lie or sham, they are the ultimate Baghdad Bob Ministry of Information.
 

AWP

Formerly Known as Freefalling
SOF Support
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
15,914
Location
Not Afghanistan
Are you saying India would have rolled them or did you have something different in mind?

The short answer is "Yes" but a more detailed explanation would be considerably longer. :) Position has given PK some clout, particularly since 1979 or so, but I question how long it would keep that position/ location without nukes. Not just for India's sake, but ours as well. Would we invade? No. Do I think our cross-border operations would be stepped up, that we'd have more latitude in pissing off the Pakistanis if they didn't have nukes? Yes. PK's nukes have influenced both PK's world view and that of India's, PK wouldn't be so ballsy, especially concerning Kashmir, if it didn't have nukes.
 

SpitfireV

Strike first, strike hard, no mercy!
Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
5,105
Location
New Zealand
I disagree, to an extent anyway. PK and IN had wars before either had nukes and they were all very limited scope wars. To be honest I don't think India would have wanted the trouble of keeping down a PK population and I do think that the PK Army would have put up a decent fight, they would have lost but if would have been bloody. Bear in mind this is all before nukes.
 

Powder

Verified Military
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
31
Location
Kentucky
I read a similar article, link posted below, and I think the thing that struck me the most was PK saying that NATO and Afg have "failed badly" at stopping the Taliban from crossing the PK border. Really? Fuck you Pakistan. "Since 2010 over 100 PK soldiers have died in cross border attacks" I think that circles back to Freefalling said about the cross border operations. With PK being the way they have been with cross border operations than how do they expect us to catch them. It's like playing a game in the backyard. Haha, I crossed the line you can't get me. GTFO.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/28/world/asia/pakistan-beheadings/index.html?iref=obnetwork
 
Top