KBar666
Unverified
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
- Messages
- 150
Ok this is a bit of loaded question, and hopefully one that is not out of line.
However why does the Ranger Regiment always seems to be treated as like second fiddle in comparison to SF? I don't feel one is "better"....God not that argument...
Their purpose and mission is different, but both are SOF.
Yet in media and more importantly even the Army's own marketing SF is treated as like the end all be all?
Is there a reason for this? Is it just cause SF litteraly has "Special" in the name?
Anyways hopefully this question is too far off base, I know it's probably walking a fine line though.
Thanks
However why does the Ranger Regiment always seems to be treated as like second fiddle in comparison to SF? I don't feel one is "better"....God not that argument...
Their purpose and mission is different, but both are SOF.
Yet in media and more importantly even the Army's own marketing SF is treated as like the end all be all?
Is there a reason for this? Is it just cause SF litteraly has "Special" in the name?
Anyways hopefully this question is too far off base, I know it's probably walking a fine line though.
Thanks