The RAND Organization

AWP

Formerly Known as Freefalling
SOF Support
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
16,458
Location
Not Afghanistan

Florida173

SOF Support
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
1,948
Location
NCR
I'd definitely say that I often times do not agree with there conclusions based on the method that they come about them. Plenty of times they have steered decision makers the wrong way in situations of threat finance and counter insurgency.

I'd read what they have to say, but I personally would never source from them.
 

QC

1 CDO
Verified SOF
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
1,784
Location
ADEGVSWGV
Used it in the past and it's interesting. Sometimes obscure but there are topics related to here. But the annual hoe handle production report and it's implications on Sub Saharan Africa is a bit of a waste of effort.
 

SpitfireV

Strike first, strike hard, no mercy!
Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
5,278
Location
New Zealand
I like them as one piece of a picture. They do produce some interesting stuff but you have to take them like any think tank- with a big pinch of salt.
 

Florida173

SOF Support
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
1,948
Location
NCR
It's frustrating when you have some officer tell you "Well RAND says this..." and you have to explain to them that their methods of coming to conclusions is often times wholly based on statistics and not proper analysis. Lack of message traffic does not equal lack of activity in my opinion.
 

Marauder06

Intel Enabler
Verified SOF
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
11,208
Location
CONUS
I use RAND often they're frequently cited in my classes and in reports I read. I've never had any problem with what they've written.
 
Top