The Trump Presidency 2.0

Blue suits and weight loss are clear indicators that someone is a Knot Zee
...of course, blacks suits and no weight loss are also clear indicators that someone is a Knot Zee
...in fact, pretty much anything that doesn't support an America-hating-TDS narrative is symptomatic of being a Knot Zee

I have no references to support this opinion - I just "know"
 
Box said:
Blue suits and weight loss are clear indicators that someone is a Knot Zee
...of course, blacks suits and no weight loss are also clear indicators that someone is a Knot Zee
...in fact, pretty much anything that doesn't support an America-hating-TDS narrative is symptomatic of being a Knot Zee

I have no references to support this opinion - I just "know"
Click to expand...
Bro I didn't even bother posting the latest hoax about the blue suit- they aren't even trying anymore. They did the *exact same trick* with the "Cruel Kids" hoax from last time. The juxtaposed pics of literally half the crowd wearing a blue suit, to include other world leaders vs the zoomed in pic of 20 people in a crowd of 10k dropped nearly simultaneously.

The internet remains fake and ghey.
 
Jaknight said:
I remember many in the pro Russian side said it was a lie that NK troops where in Ukraine. North Korea confirms troop deployment to Russia
Click to expand...
Who said this? Since you said "many".

This has been objectively true since it happened; the NY times reported on this in November, and tons of social media reporting as early as October of last year. I don't remember seeing anyone saying that was a lie cause, you know, there were pictures and reporting. And how is that pro-Russian?

If you're saying "Russia and N Korea both officially put out statements saying it happened", fine, but your framing here is weird.

ETA- The only news stories saying there weren't NK troops in Ukraiine came from the Kremlin and Biden's DoD saying they "didn't have evidence" of Nk involvment in November '24. Ironic, but that's a fun lil wrinkle.
 
Last edited:
Devildoc said:
Putin publicly thanked NK for sending troops:

Putin thanks North Korea for sending troops to fight Ukraine: 'Will never forget the heroism'
Click to expand...
This is a super stupid political move from Putin. NK doesn't have a great name on the world stage, China already isolated via tariffs and trade and the ongoing talks. Putin gets absolutely nothing from this other than incensing the lefty pro-Ukraine crowd and making Russia the target of blue haired middle-aged white lady rage.

Read the room, Vlad!
 
Blizzard said:
There's really only one plausible explanation as to why this doesn't pass, isn't there?
Click to expand...

Seems like this bill re-criminalizes "loitering for prostitution", IE most of the policing goes back to impacting victims disproportionately over traffickers. That's the main criticism I can find with a quick search.

It is dumb as shit that the original version that passed last year specifically went with 15 year olds as the cut-off instead of everyone under 18.
 
Cookie_ said:
Seems like this bill re-criminalizes "loitering for prostitution", IE most of the policing goes back to impacting victims disproportionately over traffickers. That's the main criticism I can find with a quick search.

It is dumb as shit that the original version that passed last year specifically went with 15 year olds as the cut-off instead of everyone under 18.
Click to expand...
Personally, I am 100% fine with "targeting victims," which is another word for "arresting prostitutes". It's a longer way around, but the whole industry needs to go. Don't be out on the street hooking, and you won't get arrested. When those folks are arrested, they can flip on their handler.

Politically speaking, I can at least understand why "targeting victims" hits people in their empathy bone, but it's low-order thinking.

Either way you slice it, California remains California.
 
...we must make history, to protect the children
...here we are "For The Children"
...everything we do is "For The Children"
...all Americans — their eyes are on us in the Congress to see whether we have the courage, the commitment and the conviction, to protect the children

*Nancy Pelosi, Kalifornya Congressperson, circa 2022
Click to expand...

Kremlinfornia cares about their khildren
 
9 times out of 10 (I'm no statistician), "for the children" is an emotional cover for increased government control or some other nefarious bullshit.

"For the children" is a valid reason, we just need to pump the brakes on anything using that language.
 

Similar threads

AWP
Bergdahl 2.0
2
Replies
29
Views
3K
Totentanz
Totentanz
Marauder06
Don't Automatically Assume the Worst About People
Replies
14
Views
2K
Diamondback 2/2
Diamondback 2/2
AWP
The Aging Crisis in America
Replies
8
Views
547
Dame
Dame
A
Casino Night and the 75th Rangers
Replies
0
Views
270
ALSE Sarge
A
AWP
HAPPY MONDAY FROM THE BOOK SUPPOSITORY BUILDING!!!!
Replies
13
Views
1K
Muppet
Muppet
Back
Top