Tyson v Paul Fight
- Thread starter Blizzard
- Start date
God damned 2024, fucking NSA can spy on us from million miles away but Netflix can't get their shit together!?
Last edited:
God damn!
Blizzard
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,039
That fight was terrible; not a serious one.
Not that I was expecting some great battle, but there's no way that wasn't rigged, fixed, choreographed, whatever you want to call it. Tyson literally just stood there eating some not so devastating punches while occasionally throwing a punch.
I don't know what that was, but it wasn't a legit fight.
Not that I was expecting some great battle, but there's no way that wasn't rigged, fixed, choreographed, whatever you want to call it. Tyson literally just stood there eating some not so devastating punches while occasionally throwing a punch.
I don't know what that was, but it wasn't a legit fight.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,252
Not every thread needs to be infused with politics.
Jaknight
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2018
- Messages
- 775
I honestly didn’t even think of it in political sense. I just found it funny
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 676
Best fight of the night. The L was BS. I gave this a tie.
The only thing giving Katie the edge was Serrano's eyebrow she split in the 4th round, which she then deliberately exploited to the point of the judge taking a point from her.
And when I say edge, I mean she was able to stay toe-to-toe with someone who still landed more than 100 more punches than her while fighting with her eyebrow flapping wide open for six rounds. Katie's a phenomenal boxer and now I'd love to see how she handles herself against Serrano next time without the headbutting nonsense, accidental or otherwise.
Upside to this is we got to see how tough Serrano was for sticking it out, and it's a great setup for the third match, which I'll be making a point to see.
Last edited:
Topkick
Verified Military
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 676
Solid rematch between Serrano and Taylor last night, with the ideal baseline for any fight: evenly balanced fighters who avoided clinches.
This one was probably the least entertaining of their fights because it was less of a brawl than their first two and more just clean, careful boxing. They both kept level heads the whole time and stuck pretty closely to their strategies.
Part of me saw a direct conflict of interest with Jake Paul running the event and directly advocating for Serrano, but as much as I also wanted her to win I was also glad Taylor won the match (and fairly) so you couldn't really dismiss it as a fixed fight.
The Green-Marshall fight stole the whole night and should've headlined the event. They were so into it by the end they kept fighting past the 10th round because neither heard the bell.
This one was probably the least entertaining of their fights because it was less of a brawl than their first two and more just clean, careful boxing. They both kept level heads the whole time and stuck pretty closely to their strategies.
Part of me saw a direct conflict of interest with Jake Paul running the event and directly advocating for Serrano, but as much as I also wanted her to win I was also glad Taylor won the match (and fairly) so you couldn't really dismiss it as a fixed fight.
The Green-Marshall fight stole the whole night and should've headlined the event. They were so into it by the end they kept fighting past the 10th round because neither heard the bell.
Similar threads
