Charlie Kirk shooting -

From the Durham Police Chief..stay classy!

View attachment 48450

Leave my city out of it. Well, I mean I do live 1/2 mile outside the city limit, but....

The mayor and city council are all-in on her. Love her. Support her. Already putting out she's not losing her job. The public feedback is about 75% for her/25% against her, which is pretty representative of the population.

I know cops--off all colors--who cannot stand her and are here only until they can retire and get the hell out. She is only liked by minorities and the liberal social strata.

Fucking cunt.
 
Its a city. I live near Cincinnati. Its a great city but the government is all liberal. Outside the city, we are very red.

Inside our city it's retarded liberal. Outside the city it's just stupid liberal. Republicans are definitely a minority. But I think this will sway the numbers here, a little.
 
Leave my city out of it. Well, I mean I do live 1/2 mile outside the city limit, but....

The mayor and city council are all-in on her. Love her. Support her. Already putting out she's not losing her job. The public feedback is about 75% for her/25% against her, which is pretty representative of the population.

I know cops--off all colors--who cannot stand her and are here only until they can retire and get the hell out. She is only liked by minorities and the liberal social strata.

Fucking cunt.
Typical DEI hire.
 
Oh the sweet, sweet, smell of irony using their own weapon against them. Here they even justified it's use. Either both sides can use it or none at all, pick one, you can't have both.

548298692_24436828775976531_8742029876769524479_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Cancel culture was about canceling the freedoms of speech of those they didn't like and ways to justify their doing it. Now they are saying that their freedom of speech is under attack by fascists. So they created a weapon because of their own fascism? Or is it only fascism when we do it and not them because rules for thee but not for me? Which is it then?

In chess, they'd call that a checkmate.
 
I saw a HI-lareous video of a man debating with a blue-hair nut, she was of course enthusiastically endorsing his assassination. He then asked (all quotes are paraphrasing), "so you're OK with school shootings?" Her, "of course not, they are horrible." Him, "that was a school shooting. But you are OK with that one? Or just not school shootings that fit your narrative?"

She stopped, dead in her tracks, eyes moving back and forth trying to formulate a response, and could not. She fell victim to one of the classic blunders, the most famous of which is, 'never get involved in a land war in Asia', but only slightly less well-known is, 'never go in against someone who understands how to rationally present a logical argument.
 
Back
Top