"Equal" Rights or "Special Rights" for Women?

When I read something like this from the SecNav or the SgtMaj what comes to mind is what the Rangers say/do; "THE STANDARD" (correct me if I am wrong but I have seen Rangers here type that phrase in all caps....(?) ). There should be A STANDARD and that STANDARD should be upheld. Period. If women can't hack it oh well. Does it suck? Sure. There are men who can't hack in (meaning in the infantry). @racing_kitty wrote a very nice post in another thread about the physical, mental and psychological effects thereof (which I'd like to see her write it here or copy and paste it).
 
This is a post from Sgt Maj Lehew, SgtMaj of TECOM, from his personal Facebook page:

"Ok, been silent long enough on this. I have been a part of this process from the beginning and I am just going to put it out there. The Secretary of the Navy is way off base on this and to say the things he is saying is is flat out counter to the interests of national security and is unfair to the women who participated in this study. We selected our best women for this test unit, selected our most mature female leaders as well. The men (me included) were the most progressive and open minded that you could get. The commander of this unit was a seasoned and successful infantryman. The XO of this unit was as good as they get, so good the USMC made her the CO of the Officer candidate school. I just selected the SgtMaj of the unit to head up our senior enlisted academy at Camp Lejeune, NC. No one went in to this with the mentality that we did not want this to succeed. No Marine, regardless of gender would do that. With our limited manpower we cannot afford to not train eveyone to the best of their abilities. This was as stacked as a unit could get with the best Marines to give it a 100 percent success rate as we possibly could. End result? The best women in The GCEITF as a group in regard to infantry operations were equal or below in most all cases to the lowest 5 percent of men as a group in this test study. They are slower on all accounts in almost every technical and tactical aspect and physically weaker in every aspect across the range of military operations. SECNAV has stated that he has made his mind up even before the release of these results and that the USMC test unit will not change his mind on anything. Listen up folks. Your senior leadership of this country does not want to see America overwhelmingly succeed on the battlefield, it wants to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to persue whatever they want regardless of the outcome on national security. The infantry is not Ranger School. That is just a school like any other school and is not a feeder specifically to the infantry. Anyone can go to that school that meets the prereqs, just like airborne school. Kudos to the two women who graduated. They are badasses in their own right. In regards to the infantry....there is no trophy for second place. You perform or die. Make no mistake. In this realm, you want your fastest, most fit, most physical and most lethal person you can possibly put on the battlefield to overwhelm the enemy's ability to counter what you are throwing at them and in every test case, that person has turned out to be a man. There is nothing gender biased about this, it is what it is. You will never see a female Quarterback in the NFL, there will never be a female center on any NHL team and you will never see a female batting in the number 4 spot for the New York Yankees. It is what it is. As a country we preach equality. But to place these mandates on the military before this country has even considered making females register, just like males, for the selective service is in all aspects out of touch with reality. Equality and equal opportunity start before you raise your right hand and swear and oath to this country. Yes, we are an all volunteer force at the moment. Should this country however need to mobilize rapidly again to face the threats of the world like our grandfathers did, it will once again look to the military age males of this country to fill the ranks because last I checked, we did not require women to register for the selective service. Until that happens, we should not even be wasting our time even thinking about opening up the infantry to women. To my female Marine friends out there, I love you to death, you are the best of the best and you have my continued admiration for what you do and to the Marines of the GCEITF....you are tops in my book for taking up the challenge...regardless what the SECNAV says about you not being the best that we could have put in that unit because you were....on all accounts."

I've served with SgtMaj Lehew three times now in my career and he is a man I respect.

Is he still on AD? If so, he might want to pull that post. He's going to get slammed for calling out SECNAV like that.
 
If the powers that be want fucking tits in the infantry that goddamn bad, and maintain the standard, then they need to recruit Fallon Fox, or other transgendered athletes. Kill two PC birds with one stone.
 
This is a post from Sgt Maj Lehew, SgtMaj of TECOM, from his personal Facebook page:

"Ok, been silent long enough on this. I have been a part of this process from the beginning and I am just going to put it out there. The Secretary of the Navy is way off base on this and to say the things he is saying is is flat out counter to the interests of national security and is unfair to the women who participated in this study. We selected our best women for this test unit, selected our most mature female leaders as well. The men (me included) were the most progressive and open minded that you could get. The commander of this unit was a seasoned and successful infantryman. The XO of this unit was as good as they get, so good the USMC made her the CO of the Officer candidate school. I just selected the SgtMaj of the unit to head up our senior enlisted academy at Camp Lejeune, NC. No one went in to this with the mentality that we did not want this to succeed. No Marine, regardless of gender would do that. With our limited manpower we cannot afford to not train eveyone to the best of their abilities. This was as stacked as a unit could get with the best Marines to give it a 100 percent success rate as we possibly could. End result? The best women in The GCEITF as a group in regard to infantry operations were equal or below in most all cases to the lowest 5 percent of men as a group in this test study. They are slower on all accounts in almost every technical and tactical aspect and physically weaker in every aspect across the range of military operations. SECNAV has stated that he has made his mind up even before the release of these results and that the USMC test unit will not change his mind on anything. Listen up folks. Your senior leadership of this country does not want to see America overwhelmingly succeed on the battlefield, it wants to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to persue whatever they want regardless of the outcome on national security. The infantry is not Ranger School. That is just a school like any other school and is not a feeder specifically to the infantry. Anyone can go to that school that meets the prereqs, just like airborne school. Kudos to the two women who graduated. They are badasses in their own right. In regards to the infantry....there is no trophy for second place. You perform or die. Make no mistake. In this realm, you want your fastest, most fit, most physical and most lethal person you can possibly put on the battlefield to overwhelm the enemy's ability to counter what you are throwing at them and in every test case, that person has turned out to be a man. There is nothing gender biased about this, it is what it is. You will never see a female Quarterback in the NFL, there will never be a female center on any NHL team and you will never see a female batting in the number 4 spot for the New York Yankees. It is what it is. As a country we preach equality. But to place these mandates on the military before this country has even considered making females register, just like males, for the selective service is in all aspects out of touch with reality. Equality and equal opportunity start before you raise your right hand and swear and oath to this country. Yes, we are an all volunteer force at the moment. Should this country however need to mobilize rapidly again to face the threats of the world like our grandfathers did, it will once again look to the military age males of this country to fill the ranks because last I checked, we did not require women to register for the selective service. Until that happens, we should not even be wasting our time even thinking about opening up the infantry to women. To my female Marine friends out there, I love you to death, you are the best of the best and you have my continued admiration for what you do and to the Marines of the GCEITF....you are tops in my book for taking up the challenge...regardless what the SECNAV says about you not being the best that we could have put in that unit because you were....on all accounts."

I've served with SgtMaj Lehew three times now in my career and he is a man I respect.

He's toast. I hope he is on terminal leave.
 
Basic physiology dictates human females and males are different. Period. Get over it people (meaning general public, feminazis, timid leadership). Wimmenz will never (in general, a rare individual might) be the equal of men in certain physical circumstances without the use of modern pharmaceuticals.

Standards for uniforms, hair cuts, and earrings? meh... Sure, whatever. A hundred plus years ago, men were just as much peacocks as women. I'm in favor of getting rid of all the boring dull formal colors, like black tuxedos and such in fashion in general. Why not make dress uniforms a bit more interesting? :-"

LL
 
I, for one, am grateful that there are still those who are willing to go against the flow and say what needs to be said. I certainly wish him the best!

Semper Fi, Sergeant Major!
 
Not the Marine Corps, but an article about the Army...the Article says the Army has been deliberate in it's approach and I'm laughing. Becuase, the Marine Corps was deliberate, maintained standards and came up with a resounding no.
 
I won't be surprised if the services "shop around" for a group of boot-licking lackies to "confirm" the secretary's views. Politics will destroy our military, not women or gays or martians in the military, but politics. It might take 5 years, it might take 50, but fatass gamers, lazy smart phone kiddies, even Nickelback won't break our military; politicians in uniform and out looking for that next pay grade, just give it time.
 
Him asking for their records may be unusual, but understandable. Them asking for his is just an effort to smear him should anything come of the FOIA request.
 
The saga continues: West Point women seek Congressman's Ranger School record

I will point out that the leader of West Point Women is not a Ranger School graduate and I'm unsure as to whether the newest Rangers put their ok with that FOIA request.

Attention whoring is all they are doing.

The Army says standards were not changed or lowered, give the Congressman the data to prove it and everyone is happy (except the guys who failed that particular Ranger Class).
 
Back
Top