It's not the Pentagon, it's the big contractors.Surely Hegseth is supportive of Elon, so there shouldn't be any issue auditing the Pentagon, right?
It's not the Pentagon, it's the big contractors.Surely Hegseth is supportive of Elon, so there shouldn't be any issue auditing the Pentagon, right?
That's been in our face since the GWOT kicked off. VP Cheney didn't even try to hide it, but I'm sure we don't know the half of it. I'd like to see us move forward, but also see some of these other stuffed shirts who got rich by sending us to war get exposed.It's not the Pentagon, it's the big contractors.
I was referring more to Musk's need for greater security.That's been in our face since the GWOT kicked off. VP Cheney didn't even try to hide it, but I'm sure we don't know the half of it. I'd like to see us move forward, but also see some of these other stuffed shirts who got rich by sending us to war get exposed.
It's hard telling what'll he find and who was involved if he truly pulls the curtain back on the last 25 years.I was referring more to Musk's need for greater security.
I'd like to think this is the W we all want...unless some smart people take a scalpel to the problem.
I'd like to think this is the W we all want...
I dunno. Based on corrupt officials getting their slush funds cut and whining from govt workers, I think the Pentagon and intelligence agencies might be more cutthroat. That said, if the Pentagon is full of DEI hires DOGE might come out okay.Surely Hegseth is supportive of Elon, so there shouldn't be any issue auditing the Pentagon, right?
Check to see if there is a closed down USAID or Dept of Education facility you can use. Also, what happened to your facilities previous capabilities and network equipment? Stuff doesn't magically disappear.But we know that won't happen: targeted cuts.
Earlier I mentioned my department is about 6 people short and dealing with a hiring freeze (which we were told not happen but someone, somewhere lied). Turns out it is much higher than that. I can't speak for the rest of the command.
Workers, gov and CTR alike, who don't have a hardwired connection use our Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi is saturated and those folks are literally doing nothing because they don't have connectivity. Hey, we're all in the building! Minus those 150-ish folks.
Dog-fire meme goes here. This is fine.
Anyone defending any of this is an idiot.
@Salt USMC Do you remember Nina Jankowitz aka Scary Poppins? She was the "information tsar" under Biden. She's now a registered foreign agent working in the UK. Reason I mention her, is she helped cover up the Hunter Biden laptop and a bunch of other malfeasance from the Biden Whitehouse and NHS.What do you think it is?
I agree that sunlight is the best disinfectant, however posting up line items from a spreadsheet with no context - good bad or otherwise - is just asking for misinterpretation. It’s how we got that stupid JADE HELM controversy in 2015. A spooky sounding name with some graphics leaks and a segment of the country lost their minds over it.
Figured I should save this as well.Well yeah cause people are stupid- I took part in JADE HELM, and immediately discounted the public outcry because a lot of it came out of a small town in NM, where I was on the helicopters people reported as "taking over the mountain with SEALs". It's pretty simple to look at that event, look at the information given, and go, "Oh, this is dumb." No context needed.
Here is the contract on usaspending.gov. - scroll down and look at the first graph. Notice anything weird about the years where spending exploded? Keep scrolling down- "large scale social deception" and "active social engineering defense" is pretty interesting, no? To an American company? On American soil?
Dig a little deeper on the site and check out Thomson Reuters LLC- they were actually awarded $13.6M in the child contract, with $4.72M going to "Internet Publishing and Broadcasting"... so they were using the internet to engage in large scale deception and active social engineering defense... to decieve whom? And defend against what, exactly? Now if you want to intimate that because some hills have eyes locals made some facebook posts about JADE HELM and ipso facto a vetted contract award from a .gov site is just a "random spreadsheet", I am not here to tell you you're wrong. But also, given the last few weeks, I can't possibly understand that position.
I think it falls in the same bucket as all of the other things DOGE is uncovering- we (collectively) don't know what any of it is. I can sit here and intimate that I was read into programs that seem innocuous or shady that provide a valuable and live-saving tactical purpose, especially in the PR realm- but that makes me sound douchey. I had no clue how much money was awarded to those programs and if it was used effectively, and I 100% can't say it wasn't wasted, or worse- used against Americans.
Given the tranche of malfeasance we are seeing, I'll use Occams razor and assume that the DoD funding a news organization for "large scale deception" and "active social engineering defense" during a time where the Biden admin was leveraging big tech and media to run psyops against the American people, here in America, leads me to suspect that it's not some super secret development program, cause, you know, I have eyes, and I don't trust the government.
BL- I think you're operating from the premise that there could be a super secret and necessary reason to pay Thomson Reuters Special Services LLC $60.21M (that is one of more than 20 separate LLCs that Reuters has on the site, and they operate worldwide) to engage in "large scale deception" and "active social engineering defense". I am operating from the position that we know the government has vetted programs like PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD, and the more we uncover, the more I am sure there is malfeasance, and until the government accounts for every penny and explains why we need it- I don't believe it.
We're 20 people short in the IT/ Cybersecurity realm. If they fire Group 2 Career Conditionals like me, we'll be 35+ down. If we could hire 4 of those back, we're still down by over 30. Half of my program's staff, including the PM and most of our engineers, would be cut. Support for 2 different aircraft would be done by 40% of our current staff. Other airframes wouldn't fare much better.
IT support's gutted, Cybersecurity is poor, about half of our engineers are gone, and program management takes a 20-30% hit. I can't speak for contracting, logistics, etc.
The same or increased workload with half of the staff? That's sounds efficient.
I thought DoD was exemptTell them they can have me here in Atlanta at ST Level 5 + Geography multiplier.