Iraq and ISIS Discussion

Topkick said:
Whether or not we can take down the Iranian Army and its government is not in question. We could. Its what happens after that I would be concerned with. These countries do not want to evolve. Research the Iran hostage crisis of 1979. If we ever do take Iran, we better have a fool- proof post invasion plan or I am afraid we have not seen the depths of terrorism we could see.
Click to expand...

I agree we haven't seen the full depths of terrorism from the likes of Iran. My concerns is a dirty nuke in our backyard.

But anyway, I've stated my point of view enough for awhile.

FUCK ISIS!
 
Diamondback 2/2 said:
I've changed my mind, you are absolutely right. There is no way we can move logistics through two sea ports (I mean not like we did it in a landlocked country or anything). We would never be able to protect our flanks against the amazing military forces of Iraq and Afghanistan (which we had already owned at that point) and we would totally be stopped cold by 100 million Iranian booger eaters (that didn't exist in 2003, yeah it was more like 60 mil than and 90 mil now, but thats beside the point not every civil is going pick up a gun). I guess while you tremble at the prospect of taking out our enemies in Iran, we can wait and see what they end up doing with that nuclear program.:rolleyes:

At least if we had done it in 03, I wouldn't have to worry about my kids having the finish the job, or if these fuck end up sneaking a nuke into our country.O_o
Click to expand...

Are you trolling right now...cuz I can't tell. I wasn't talking specifically about the Iranian population, but the combined population of Afghanistan, Iran, and Iraq with addition of the real estate with the size of our force at that point. Occupation Models post 9/11 do not shake out. The occupation model of Post WWII shakes out.
 
US: Hey, stay out of our exclusion zone.
Russia: Nah, we're good.
US: Seriously.
Russia: How about some of our proxies?
Us: Pew, pew, pew.

US-led coalition airstrikes targeted pro-Syrian regime forces - CNNPolitics.com

Washington (CNN)US-led coalition aircraft bombed pro-Syrian regime forces Thursday that "were advancing well inside an established de-confliction zone," according to a statement issued by Operation Inherent Resolve, the official name for the coalition fighting ISIS.

The statement said the pro-regime militias "posed a threat to US and partner forces at At Tanf," a remote base in southern Syria near the Syria-Jordan-Iraq border that coalition advisers have used to train "Vetted Syrian Opposition" to aid the fight against ISIS.
Click to expand...
 
AWP said:
Pakistan is a valuable and critical component of the GWOT. Without Pakistan's heavy and effective involvement we wouldn't be where we are today.
Click to expand...

I know you meant that sarcastically/ironically. Still couldn't stop the "hate." ;)
 
Topkick said:
Service stations and cafes, huh? Unless things have changed recently, that country doesn't care about evolution or what the west calls " progress"
Click to expand...

They are too busy, sitting on the ground eating goat and rice with their hands sucking down that shit tea, and plotting their next way to beat women and kill gays, to think of luxury. Praise be to God and God willing, they will kill all the infadels and return Persia to its glory days, of tribal raids and slaves.:hmm:
 

Similar threads

Blizzard
ISIS Reportedly Attacks Iranian Parliament
Replies
7
Views
2K
Blizzard
Blizzard
goodvibes33
Mexican Army Special Operations Forces History and the War on Drugs
2
Replies
20
Views
11K
goodvibes33
goodvibes33
DA SWO
Secretive U.S. Spy Plane Crashes in Iraq
Replies
2
Views
2K
LimaOscarSierraTango
LimaOscarSierraTango
Ooh-Rah
Hero SAS sniper saves father and eight-year-old son from being beheaded by ISIS maniac
Replies
2
Views
3K
Dame
Dame
CQB
IS takes control of Muthanna
Replies
10
Views
2K
pardus
pardus
Back
Top