Iraq and ISIS Discussion

Like the article I linked to in my post? You must have been Comm in a previous life.

:wall:8-)
C'mon. That was buried in a correction at the bottom of the article.

858760bc5e12b1f90f6eac36abac2669166ab18b488ec5f0c1f77ceff491fbf6.jpg
 
Funker360 - Nice going........idiots.

Murphy? And SOFREP? Same. His cavalier attitude in response to publishing and posting this article just sent me over the edge.

I guess between the 2 of them, they can decide what's ok to put out there and what isn't.

He even went back and sanitized quite a few of the comments criticizing him for the same since I first read it. What a guy. :rolleyes:

Jack Murphy | Facebook
 
Funker360 - Nice going........idiots.

Murphy? And SOFREP? Same. His cavalier attitude in response to publishing and posting this article just sent me over the edge.

I guess between the 2 of them, they can decide what's ok to put out there and what isn't.

He even went back and sanitized quite a few of the comments criticizing him for the same since I first read it. What a guy. :rolleyes:

Jack Murphy | Facebook
Agreed, but like too.
Metadata can be a bitch.
 
Last edited:
Our last president also said chemical agents were a line in the sand....and then he proceeded to do nothing when the line was repeatedly crossed. No matter our leadership they can't go around and make statements without backing them up because it makes us look weak.
 
The problem is that our last president did over commit us. He drew a red line and then didn't do anything when Syria called his bluff. Our nation can't bluff. Our entire deterrence strategy rests on our resolve to employ nuclear weapons. South Korea and Japan are both counting on us to shield them with our nuclear umbrella against the DPRK. Our Eastern European allies rely on us to do the same against Russia.

President Obama should not have drawn a red line if he wasn't willing to enforce it. It makes us look weak.

I do not think this commitment extends to the past president. The red line is still there but there is a new hand hovering over the red button. There is room to address this using other elements of national power without potentially kicking off WWIII.
 
It appears our current president might be doubling-down on that mistake. :( Trump: Gas attack "crossed many lines"

From the article:

Trump described the attack as "horrible" and "unspeakable." He faulted Obama for failing to carry through on his "red line" threat and when asked if he had responsibility to respond to the attack, said: "I now have responsibility".

Every little thing a POTUS says is interpreted by our enemies and allies alike, every little nuance of meaning is dissected. Reagan was an expert in alluding to the hell that might befall anybody who fucks with America, even if he never really said anything specific. Even an off-mike jest, some of which were intentional, could spread fear in foreign capitals. Maybe Trump is starting to learn. One thing is for certain, he's facing a put-up or shut-up moment over the gas attack.
 
From the article:

Trump described the attack as "horrible" and "unspeakable." He faulted Obama for failing to carry through on his "red line" threat and when asked if he had responsibility to respond to the attack, said: "I now have responsibility".

Every little thing a POTUS says is interpreted by our enemies and allies alike, every little nuance of meaning is dissected. Reagan was an expert in alluding to the hell that might befall anybody who fucks with America, even if he never really said anything specific. Even an off-mike jest, some of which were intentional, could spread fear in foreign capitals. Maybe Trump is starting to learn. One thing is for certain, he's facing a put-up or shut-up moment over the attack on the chemical weapons depot.
 
Back
Top