At least one source is saying that it's Rangers.
Like the article I linked to in my post? You must have been Comm in a previous life.
:wall:

At least one source is saying that it's Rangers.
C'mon. That was buried in a correction at the bottom of the article.Like the article I linked to in my post? You must have been Comm in a previous life.
:wall:![]()
Agreed, but like too.Funker360 - Nice going........idiots.
Murphy? And SOFREP? Same. His cavalier attitude in response to publishing and posting this article just sent me over the edge.
I guess between the 2 of them, they can decide what's ok to put out there and what isn't.
He even went back and sanitized quite a few of the comments criticizing him for the same since I first read it. What a guy.
Jack Murphy | Facebook
The surprise deployment to the dam was said to have been largely made possible via US airlift capabilities and fire support. Although the number of troops involved in the operation remains unconfirmed, multiple reports put it around 500.
Canadian mission extended until June 30 and teams have now entered Mosul with the Iraqi's.
Canadian special forces taking more active role in Iraq as Liberals extend ISIS mission
What are the facts?
The fact is, no one knows right now. Yet that’s not stopping the cries for “someone” (i.e. the US) to “do something!!!” (i.e. intervene militarily). Our last president was smart enough to not over-commit us in Syria. I hope the current president follows suit. Here’s why:
The problem is that our last president did over commit us. He drew a red line and then didn't do anything when Syria called his bluff. ....
It appears our current president might be doubling-down on that mistake.Trump: Gas attack "crossed many lines"
It appears our current president might be doubling-down on that mistake.Trump: Gas attack "crossed many lines"
From the article:
Trump described the attack as "horrible" and "unspeakable." He faulted Obama for failing to carry through on his "red line" threat and when asked if he had responsibility to respond to the attack, said: "I now have responsibility".
Every little thing a POTUS says is interpreted by our enemies and allies alike, every little nuance of meaning is dissected. Reagan was an expert in alluding to the hell that might befall anybody who fucks with America, even if he never really said anything specific. Even an off-mike jest, some of which were intentional, could spread fear in foreign capitals. Maybe Trump is starting to learn. One thing is for certain, he's facing a put-up or shut-up moment over the attack on the chemical weapons depot.
YikesIt appears our current president might be doubling-down on that mistake.Trump: Gas attack "crossed many lines"