...Nations often go to war when they feel their national interests are threatened. So, what's China going to do about it?
That will always be the razors edge for ANY nations leaders to do their balancing act.
How far can you go one way or the other...
...do you let EVERYONE take advantage of you, slowly depleting the public coffers
...do you let the world encroach on your buffer zones because you don't want to risk antagonizing a response
...do you look inward and put the weight back on your citizens
...do you look outward and break a few windows; daring anyone to retaliate.
Bullies and Opportunists are ALWAYS going to take advantage of any given situation. Maybe it's OK to acknowledge and just look the other way to keep then happy in the name of peace an quiet.
...but when does one say "enough is enough"
China has been exploiting our trade practices for a loooong time now. Poor trade polices (
done under the mask of peaceful trade) have allowed them to expand their global influence to a dangerous level.
While the US sat quietly and did little.
So, I ask everyone - seriously - when comes the adverse of that question after decades of the USA footing everyone's bills, surrendering to everyone else's trade practices, watching communism (
communism and socialism are bad folks - really - they're both bad - in spite of what everyone on the left keeps telling us) creep into our backyards, our schools, and our national governance...
"
Nations often go to war when they feel their national interests are threatened."
So, I ask, what is the USA going to do about it?
We the people allow our Selected leaders to treat foreign policy like fucking pop tarts. This year its the "
Frosted Cherry" foreign policy - then after the midterms, we'll go with "
Protein Boosted Brown Sugar Cinnamon" then as soon as the next political party takes the White House, we'll shift to the "
Frosted Chocolate Fudge" foreign policy...
...all the while, wondering why we are constantly dealing with some sort of fucking crisis.
Here's why:
It's because our shitty, corrupted, bought and paid for leaders are more worried about their bottom line than they are about "we the people"
It's the same reason we have continued to pretend that NATO is helping to save us from the boogey man after 50 years of NATO living rent free in our fucking basement, eating all of our god damn Pop Tarts without ever going to the mother fucking grocery store.
NATO had a very specific itch that needed scratching. The itch got scratched but those "
in NATO" benefiting are just like any other mutt that curls up at your feet. Scratch them enough, and they dont want you to stop. You don't mind scratching him. It's a good dog. You want want your dog to be happy, but enough is enough, go lay down.
But the dog wants to be scratched. Then they begin to irritate you. They nudge your hand, they paw at you, they bark, they whine...
...its still a good dog, but it just seems to have forgotten who the "alpha" is in the house.
...its still a good dog, it just doesn't realize that YOU are the one feeding it and letting it sleep indoors on a cushion
...its still a good dog, but it needs to be put the fuck outside to sleep in the doghouse until it gets its mind straight again.
NATO is still a good dog. It just needs to get smacked on the fucking nose and put outside to learn to appreciate how fucking good life really is.
The problem is, that fucking dog has started acting WAY too playful with the fucking strangers that it was meant to help protect to against.
"No more forever wars" is an existential promise. It's also pretty hard to label what is going on as the start of "another forever war" based on EVERYTHING that we have seen from both parties over the last 75 years.
The idea that NATO is "worried" about "what is China going to do" is all the proof that I need that they need to be oput in the fucking dog house for awhile. They were supposed to be a guard dog. You brought him home to be a companion and a watch dog.
But he hasn't watched SHIT.
He isn't guarding you from shit.
When the Russians and the Chinese come knocking, they lick their fucking hands instead of chasing them off.
BAD DOG NATO.
BAD DOG
We have ALL gotten so used to empty actions meant to soothe our "allies" or build the investment portfolios of our politicians and their DefenseContractoCampaignDonations addiction that we lost sight of what the fucking preamble to the constitution means - or even says for that matter. As a result, we worry about "what if this makes the Russian and Chinese want to go to war instead of - "
If those mother fuckers dont stop fucking us over, WE are going to war"
It's scary. It paints the picture of a bleak future. It is the opposite of "pursuit of happiness" - but it is reality - worrying about doing something that will give bullies a reason to go to war while letting them fuck us over by doing that very same thing - well - it's just my opinion but that is the definition of surrendering.
On that same "dog metaphor" - there is one side of the aisle that seems to think putting the dog outside is evil. There is a cross section of society that wants you to believe you are a monster if you don't give your misbehaving dog a fucking treat just because it sits down next to the treat jar and gives you the puppy dog face. It's ok to shit on the floor - because you're a good dog. It's ok to chew my slippers because you are a good dog. It's ok to bite the children because you are a good dog.
I'm done wondering "what the bad guys are going to do"
I'm actively asking "why aren't we punching someone in the fucking nose and telling them to sit down and shut up"
None of this should be taken seriously of course - I'm just a washed up biased, shamelessly partisan conspiracy nut with little actual knowledge of world events and their sociopolitical consequences.