D
Deleted member 11415
Guest
The Problem With ‘Let Marines Be Marines’[/QUOTE]
I am fully supportive of righteous anger about the MU nonsense. That's a sentiment echoed by every single Marine I know. I was at a Marine Transition Course when the MU scandal broke and the reaction was 100% pissed off.
This author is interpreting the data on sexual assaults wrong and could learn a thing or two about what he's running his mouth about .
I believe it is irresponsible journalism to draw the false conclusion that the Marine Corps has more repeat sexual assaults then the other branches. It is widely known at DOD-SAPRO (DOD-Sexual Assault Prevention & Response Office) that the other branches are not reporting the actual number of sexual assaults.
If there are ten rapes in the Army and ten rapes in the Marines, just because the Army reports 0 rapes doesn't make the Marines super-rapey because they report 7 and step on it for 3.
So, really, if the author is not supporting eliminating rape in the Marines, what is he really saying? I think he's saying he's doesn't give two shits about sexual assault prevention and response.
The Marine Corps is doing what it is supposed to do and is being spotlighted as the problem.
It is dillutes the conversation and shifts the focus from the actual problem and just does not support successfully prosecuting bonafide sexual assault in any of the branches.
Besides that, anadotal as it may be, every Marine I know is vocally against rape in action and word.
Personally, I think the author should focus his enthusiasm for military sexual assault policy on the equitable delivery of regulations and policies for Male Sexual Assault Response in every branch.
I am fully supportive of righteous anger about the MU nonsense. That's a sentiment echoed by every single Marine I know. I was at a Marine Transition Course when the MU scandal broke and the reaction was 100% pissed off.
This author is interpreting the data on sexual assaults wrong and could learn a thing or two about what he's running his mouth about .
I believe it is irresponsible journalism to draw the false conclusion that the Marine Corps has more repeat sexual assaults then the other branches. It is widely known at DOD-SAPRO (DOD-Sexual Assault Prevention & Response Office) that the other branches are not reporting the actual number of sexual assaults.
If there are ten rapes in the Army and ten rapes in the Marines, just because the Army reports 0 rapes doesn't make the Marines super-rapey because they report 7 and step on it for 3.
So, really, if the author is not supporting eliminating rape in the Marines, what is he really saying? I think he's saying he's doesn't give two shits about sexual assault prevention and response.
The Marine Corps is doing what it is supposed to do and is being spotlighted as the problem.
It is dillutes the conversation and shifts the focus from the actual problem and just does not support successfully prosecuting bonafide sexual assault in any of the branches.
Besides that, anadotal as it may be, every Marine I know is vocally against rape in action and word.
Personally, I think the author should focus his enthusiasm for military sexual assault policy on the equitable delivery of regulations and policies for Male Sexual Assault Response in every branch.