If he was from the Commonwealth he wouldn't get the VC because of the friendly fire, although the grenade wasn't from a friendly so at the end of the day he probably deserves the top medal.
The nomination, which relies on witness statements, forensics, bomb fragment analysis and an autopsy, concluded that although Peralta was shot in the head, he made "a conscious, heroic decision to cover the grenade and minimize the effects he knew it would have on the rest of his Marine team."The nomination details Peralta's actions in the final minutes of his life, with several witnesses recounting how the Marine lay face down and used his arm to pull the grenade to him. It also says a forensic analysis of Peralta's clothing and flak jacket show the grenade was underneath him when it exploded.
Friendly fire or not, he sacrificed himself for his brothers.
I'll bite. Why isn't he entitled to it?
That was my first thought as well. That is shameful to the memory of Sgt. Peralta.The MoH was award to PO Monsoor and he did practically the same thing.
That was my first thought as well. That is shameful to the memory of Sgt. Peralta.
They're lawyering this way too much. There is no way to disprove that the Marine didn't know he was mortally wounded. Should've awarded him the MOH. SECDEF jacked this one up.
464 MOHs were awarded for WWII, 133 for Korea, and 246 for Vietnam.
Five MOHs have been awarded for OEF + OIF.
Five.