- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,548
- VIDEO -
I have lost track of the times I have referenced this movie over the past few years.
- VIDEO -
I couldn't agree with this more.
This situation with stumpy reminds me of the one in AZ(?) a few years back.
Dude In a motorized wheelchair stole something from a store and was riding around with a knife.
Cop shot him in the back (with civilians in the line of fire) because the knife was a deadly weapon.
Like fuck dude, put a stick in his tires or tip his wheelchair over first. Dude doesn't exactly have the mobility advantage.
Agreed and Agreed.Let me first say I have not seen the video of the wheelchair dude.
That said, this falls into the category of what we call ‘lawful but awful’.
I’m OK with the police killing anyone who needs killing. I’m not OK with using a legal technicality to justify lethal force when other options were available.
On another note, this is why every officer should have access to less than lethal tools like 40mm launchers with impact rounds or beanbag shotguns.
At some point I want some "No Justice, No Peace" protesting because crime has actually gotten out of control. But wondering how many have to be murdered before that happens.
Person Of Color Runs Over Doctor, Then Stabs Him To Death Over 'White Privilege': Witness
Nothing will happen because Liberal Whites (looking at you Antifa) don't care.Crickets. Does not fit race baiting agenda.
Oh, ban cars and knives.
Imagine, just imagine if this were reversed. Fucking shame no matter who it is, innocent folks don't deserve this but, if this were reversed, the cities would burn..... again.
Crickets. Does not fit race baiting agenda.
Oh, ban cars and knives.
Imagine, just imagine if this were reversed. Fucking shame no matter who it is, innocent folks don't deserve this but, if this were reversed, the cities would burn..... again.
“Might Have to Kill a Few People”In addition, Perry speculated about how he might get away with such a killing – by claiming self-defense, as he is now doing. Prosecutors presented a Facebook Messenger chat between Perry and a friend, Michael Holcomb, which occurred two weeks before he shot Foster. In it, Perry argued that shooting protesters was legal if it was in self-defense. Holcomb, who was called to the stand Wednesday afternoon, seemed to try to talk Perry down. "Aren't you a CDL holder too?" he asked, referring to the men's licenses to carry concealed handguns. "We went through the same training ... Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot."
It doesn't have shit to do with a "Soros-backed" DA, because the DA isn't part of the jury.
How'd a bunch of Texans decide this dude was guilty, even though Texas has strong stand your ground laws?
Maybe because the dude legit had a plan for how he wanted to get away with it.
“Might Have to Kill a Few People”
It's not a good shoot, no matter how you slice it.
It has plenty to do with the DA though. The Austin Police Department said it was justifiable homicide, no?
It's fucking Austin, a California wannabe city.It doesn't have shit to do with a "Soros-backed" DA, because the DA isn't part of the jury.
How'd a bunch of Texans decide this dude was guilty, even though Texas has strong stand your ground laws?
Maybe because the dude legit had a plan for how he wanted to get away with it.
“Might Have to Kill a Few People”
It's not a good shoot, no matter how you slice it.
One of the detectives came out today and said the DA withheld exculpatory evidence. He should get a new trial on appeal, and hopefully a new venue.^He was convicted of an Austin jury, not a "Texas" jury. I like Austin, I fully support their freedom to be weird ass hipsters, commie Nancy boys even, I can't support burning down Starbucks and CVS in Austin for a cop killing somebody in Minneapolis.
One of the detectives came out today and said the DA withheld exculpatory evidence. He should get a new trial on appeal, and hopefully a new venue.