Funny how everyone's against the cops, up until when they need the cops.
I'm pretty sure the city council is adding fuel to the fire. Those commie fucks are doing everything they can to aid the rioters. When I find it again I'll post it, but in Portland the transportation authority wants to get rid of the barricades protecting the fed courthouse.Chief Best's letter to the City Council Regarding the tying of her hands in regards to crowd control: Letter to City Council Regarding Council Ordinance 119805 – Crowd Control Tools
This probably also goes in the defunding police thread but it needs to go in here too.
Chief Best is sending a letter to Residents and Business stating that under the new ordinance she cannot protect their homes or businesses.
I thought this was cute, in a sadistic way. Bending the knee to the mob just means you get walked on.
Radio host mocked Trump by claiming Seattle is peaceful, then rioters torched his apartment building
Does Patrol include Traffic Enforcement?The Seattle City Council aims to cut SPD's budget by 25%. A specific council woman targeted the Patrol branch of SPD in her listed out items and would effectively eliminate Patrol.
Chief’s Letter to City Council in Response to Decriminalize Seattle/King County Equity Now Proposals
Does Patrol include Traffic Enforcement?
Basing this off the Website, Patrol seems to be a separate division from Traffice.Does Patrol include Traffic Enforcement?
Standing peacefully in front of federal officers with your hands down in a public space and speaking to them does not merit the disproportionately 'stupid prize' of being swung at full force repeatedly with a baton.Because having a productive conversation during a riot is an expectation for federal law enforcement in riot gear... I'm guessing he was expecting a "thank you for your service" with all the vet swag
No, but when given a lawful order to disperse, particularly in the midst of a riot, and you instead choose to stand your ground, you can and should expect to be forcefully motivated to reconsider. Case in point. He knew what he was doing. Now, he reaps the consequences.Standing peacefully in front of federal officers with your hands down in a public space and speaking to them does not merit the disproportionately 'stupid prize' of being swung at full force repeatedly with a baton.
Unless your idea of a wall is a scrawny lone fence-climber who by a stroke of luck turns out to be a vet, not a single one of your links supports your claim that the 'wall of vets' 'became' 'the bomb throwers'.You mean the same "wall of vets" that turned into a wall of vet bomb throwers?
Consequences that do not justify a lack of nuance in interpreting the results and certainly did not merit responding with the degree of disproportionality exhibited by the recklessly full-forced multiple swings of the baton-wielding officer - and doubly so when in possession of far more effective non-lethal substances like the pepper spray that was finally used.No, but when given a lawful order to disperse, particularly in the midst of a riot, and you instead choose to stand your ground, you can and should expect to be forcefully motivated to reconsider. Case in point. He knew what he was doing. Now, he reaps the consequences.
Are you purposely trying to piss folks off?Unless your idea of a wall is a scrawny lone fence-climber who by a stroke of luck turns out to be a vet, not a single one of your links supports your claim that the 'wall of vets' 'became' 'the bomb throwers'.
Your envisioned scene would still make for a interesting movie trailer, though.