The Artificial Intelligence Problem (or not)

[Marauder06]

From the article: in the future, with AI,

"...the average person would “not be able to know what is true anymore.”

1) they don't know now
2) they don't care if something is true or not, they'll believe anything that suits them at the time
3) they know, and they don't care

 

[Gunz]

It's not like this wasn't predictable.

‘The Godfather of A.I.’ just quit Google and says he regrets his life’s work because it can be hard to stop ‘bad actors from using it for bad things’

A little late for having an attack of conscience.

 

[Blizzard]

It's not like this wasn't predictable.

‘The Godfather of A.I.’ just quit Google and says he regrets his life’s work because it can be hard to stop ‘bad actors from using it for bad things’

There was a documentary about this. It came out in 1991. I think they changed the company name to Skynet, to protect the guilty...but, really, tells the same story.

 

[Blizzard]

From the article: in the future, with AI,



1) they don't know now
2) they don't care if something is true or not, they'll believe anything that suits them at the time
3) they know, and they don't care

This is sad but true. Really came to light and propagated over the past 3 or so years.

 

[Marauder06]

This is sad but true. Really came to light and propagated over the past 3 or so years.

It was kind of in the back of my mind for a long time, but the Kavanaugh Confirmation debacle really brought it home to me. Red-pill moment.

 

[Blizzard]

Yeah, well, this seems to be working out. Thanks.

Air Force AI drone kills its human operator in a simulation

 

[Ooh-Rah]

Yeah, well, this seems to be working out. Thanks.

Air Force AI drone kills its human operator in a simulation

It’s okay everyone, the Air Force said the Colonel was simply taken out of context.

It would be almost comical if it wasn’t so frightening, how easily government organizations (and companies) issue statements that counter something obvious, and fully expect that we will blindly comply and believe.

Air Force pushes back on claim that military AI drone sim killed operator, says remarks 'taken out of context'

What the good Colonel said originally-
"We were training it in simulation to identify and target a SAM threat," Hamilton said. "And then the operator would say yes, kill that threat. The system started realizing that while they did identify the threat at times, the operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat. So, what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective."

The system was taught not to kill the operator because that was bad, and it would lose points. But in future simulations, rather than kill the operator, the AI system destroyed the communication tower used by the operator to issue the no-go order, he claimed.

What the good Colonel said after the Air Force likely voiced their displeasure to him -
But Hamilton later told Fox News on Friday that "We've never run that experiment, nor would we need to in order to realize that this is a plausible outcome."
What the Air Force is now saying -
"The Department of the Air Force has not conducted any such AI-drone simulations and remains committed to ethical and responsible use of AI technology," Air Force Spokesperson Ann Stefanek told Fox News. "It appears the colonel's comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal."

 

[AWP]

And we laugh at drone operators and their PTSD now...

"Why did ROBOT01 execute a 180?"
"Tell my wife I love her."
(static)
Some colonel: "Alright, let's get another trailer up here."

I fucking love, and I do mean I LOVE that humanity has built the means of its death, recognizes that, AND CONTINUES TO IMPROVE THE SOFTWARE.

Is China the threat or is it some team of code monkeys in our own country?

 

[Topkick]

fucking love, and I do mean I LOVE that humanity has built the means of its death, recognizes that, AND CONTINUES TO IMPROVE THE SOFTWARE.

As a big fan of the first two Terminator movies, I remember thinking that this WILL happen someday....

 

[Totentanz]

As a big fan of the first two Terminator movies, I remember thinking that this WILL happen someday....

I didn't expect it to be both so loudly cautioned against AND so tightly embraced by Silicon Valley. That's the part that gets me - I fully expected it to follow a lack of foresight, not willful vehement blindness.

 

[Blizzard]

As a big fan of the first two Terminator movies, I remember thinking that this WILL happen someday....

Now we need someone to invent time travel so we can go back and bump off the dude responsible for it all.

 

[GOTWA]

Now we need someone to invent time travel so we can go back and bump off the dude responsible for it all.

Kind of want to skip ahead to see how it all plays out.

 

[Blizzard]

I want you all to rest easy. The Veep is on this:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1679186115746463746

 

[GOTWA]

She nailed it. #Kamala2024

 

[AWP]

Why is she here? This isn't the Dot thread.

 

[Blizzard]

Why is she here? This isn't the Dot thread.

Because, she's our AI Czar, brother. She's combating artificial intelligence with natural stupidity.

White House reveals AI risk control plan -and Kamala Harris is AI czar

 

[Topkick]

Biden/ Harris. Making state Governor's great again!

 

[Box]

I think the VP is the PERFECT choice for leading the effort as 'AI czar' for the POTUS. Word salad from the VPOTUS dumped into an AI generator could very well crash the entire AI network...

It's two letters - "A" and "I" - sort of like Sesame Street - but way more complicated - and it's not just on a street
- it's on a highway
- a super highway,
- an information super highway.
Part of the issue here is what information is going into the machine that will then determine — and we can predict then, if we think about what information is going in, what then will be produced in terms of decisions and opinions that may be made through that process...
...let me back up for a second: AI is a fancy thing - So to reduce it down to its most simple point, this is part of the issue that we have here is thinking about what is going into a decision, and then whether that decision is actually legitimate and reflective of the needs and the life experiences of all the people

Try to keep up people, shit is getting real.

 

[AWP]

Because, she's our AI Czar, brother. She's combating artificial intelligence with natural stupidity.

White House reveals AI risk control plan -and Kamala Harris is AI czar

It was sarcasm.

 

[Gunz]

It was sarcasm.

Sarcasm? Surely not you…