Red Ryder
Unverified
Sounds like one BAMF!
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-incredible-saga-of-col-peter-j-ortiz/
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-incredible-saga-of-col-peter-j-ortiz/
Now that is one bad dude... and a hell of a UW Soldier.
I know what you meant.![]()
since Marines were originally known as Naval Infantry historically, and were the ground soldiers as well as boarding parties from ancient to modern times, Soldier is a correct term when referencing their actions on the brown.
since Marines were originally known as Naval Infantry historically, and were the ground soldiers as well as boarding parties from ancient to modern times, Soldier is a correct term when referencing their actions on the brown.
Says the Army guy...![]()
I think the ballsiest thing he did was wear his USMC uniform around England.
Ok.... ground sailor just sounds so demeaning.....
since Marines were originally known as Naval Infantry historically, and were the ground soldiers as well as boarding parties from ancient to modern times, Soldier is a correct term when referencing their actions on the brown.
Do you mean France?
No.
Army leadership was very, very touchy concerning Marines in the ETO. We know they were there, I think many of us knew that prior to this thread, but the Army considered Europe to be its war. Marshall had a hard-on for keeping Marines out of Europe. Books blend together after a bit, but I think it was Rick Atkinson's An Army at Dawn which covered this in maybe one or two paragraphs. Keeping the Corps in the Pacific wasn't just a practical matter, it was one of "pride" by Army leadership.
My comment though was part tongue-in-cheek, but based on reality.
Army leadership was very, very touchy concerning Marines in the ETO. We know they were there, I think many of us knew that prior to this thread, but the Army considered Europe to be its war. Marshall had a hard-on for keeping Marines out of Europe...