For myself, Twitter and MSM. Stories a few days ago have Clinton mentioned around 50 times. I've seen folks almost bragging that Trump isn't involved, but their justification is the testimony of ONE person.
John Doe 107 is interesting to me because it is a woman who (I've seen conflicting versions, go figure) who may or may night be a victim OR is one of the clients. She has a petition in to redact her name because she lives in a "conservative country" and fears for her and her family's safety.
Allegedly another round of docs will drop soon regardless of 107's efforts.
People are still wading through everything, but I'm taking it with a shaker or two of salt. For example, Epstein bragged he had a phone call with Cate Blanchett, an actress. The one account which mentions Blanchett also states Epstein liked to brag about his calls because it showed his clout or whatever. There's no evidence Blanchett went to any of his properties or had any other contact with him. I think the "170 names" will whittle down to a much smaller group of repeat offenders. Given the emotions around this with some of personalities involved, we'll need a lot of context for each individual.
Nothing will come of this though. It SHOULD, but we know how this story ends. The best we can hope for is to taint someone's legacy or a civil suit that is settled out of court.