Negativity bias, retrospective voting + attribution error, cost of ruling.Which is my point. Replace them all. A vote for any incumbent is a vote for the status quo. Anyone voting for the incumbent is happy with the current system.
Negativity bias, retrospective voting + attribution error, cost of ruling.Which is my point. Replace them all. A vote for any incumbent is a vote for the status quo. Anyone voting for the incumbent is happy with the current system.
Which is my point. Replace them all. A vote for any incumbent is a vote for the status quo. Anyone voting for the incumbent is happy with the current system.
"I am a former CIA Officer, listen to me."
"I am a former Army Ranger and Paratrooper, listen to me."
No no Mr Crow, you are human excrement. Eff off.
(I am not any of those things, just a old broke cavalryman)
Media suggests the video is just to remind us of our oath and to not follow illegal orders, but seems to miss when they specifically say "Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home" They went further urging service members to "refuse illegal orders.” it's just political rhetoric that is protected by their 1st amendment right and made to sound official.. but at least they "have our back"
Well this is uh, interesting.
Fugees rapper Pras Michel sentenced to 14 years in prison over illegal donations to Obama campaign
She's disappointed in the system but she's not going home broke. Lol.Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., announced late Friday she will resign her seat in Congress,
I'm guessing she's looking at a run for POTUS in 2028. Maybe senate. She is still pushing the MAGA agenda while Trump is not fulfilling his MAGA campaign promises, and could use this against JD in the campaign. "See, I'm the true MAGA candidate"Maybe she'll be the next member of The View. lol
She's disappointed in the system but she's not going home broke. Lol.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rep-marjorie-taylor-greenes-net-123021582.html
Its been said that Congress is Hollywood for ugly people. Its where the talentless go to get rich and famous.I bet we'd get higher quality recruits if retirement vested at 4 years in the Army...Congress gets 80% of the average of top 3 earning years if they serve five or more years. Crazy work.
Could you provide a link to what you're talking about?Congress gets 80% of the average of top 3 earning years if they serve five or more years.
Might have been google AI halucinating on me.Could you provide a link to what you're talking about?
At first glance it looks like you may be either misunderstanding your source or just referencing something that is incorrect.
Yup, and no worries, because that persistent rumor about Congress folks' retirement plans is so pervasive that it can actually surprising to see they're actually on par with the rest of standard federal workers.Might
Might have been google AI halucinating on me.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL30631
So if I did that right just now. 174,000x5x.01 is definitely not 80%. So she she should get $8700/year when she turns 62.
Point kinda stands though, if you got say 5k/year for the rest of your life after 4 years of service things would change a bit on quality of recruits.
And short of them actually passing something like the ETHICS Act, which would be a clear conflict of interest for many of them, I don't see any obvious offramp from the insider trading issue.They don't need a retirement. Look at their investment portfolios. Them collecting a retirement is insulting.