At a Leader Professional Development session yesterday, the moderator asked each table of ten individuals to discuss, and come to a consensus on, whether you'd rather fight one horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses. No further information was provided. Given the utility and amusement that arose from the discussion, I though it might be fun to do it here as well. (as it turns out this is a pretty common team-building thing but this was the first time I had ever seen it)
So, if you choose to participate, here's how it works: just answer the question. You have to pick one of the two, you can't choose both or neither (e.g. I'd run away). Then you explain your reasoning, in however much detail you want to. Example:
-----
"I'd fight the horses, because..."
-----
You can only respond to someone else's post after you've made your own pubic declaration. If you critique someone else's response before posting your own (you can do it all in the same post if you want) I'll kill that post. No critiquing unless you're willing to hold your own opinion up for criticism. As always, keep it civil.
To spice it up, feel free to add a humorous stereotypical military-related response as well, such as:
AC130 pilot: "Duck. Fewer squirters."
SF: <trains insurgent horses to lead an uprising against evil repressive duck overlord>
Marine: "Hold my beer." <gets drunk, strips naked, rides the duck into battle against the horses>
Ranger: "I'll fight all of them. I don't give a f#$k. RLTW!!"
SEAL #1: "You pick; my book contract will be the same amount regardless."
SEAL #2: "I wouldn't fight either, but I'd write a book about it to make everyone think I did, and then I'd start a company called SOFREP."
I'm going to write an article based on the responses and I'll post it here when it's done.
So, if you choose to participate, here's how it works: just answer the question. You have to pick one of the two, you can't choose both or neither (e.g. I'd run away). Then you explain your reasoning, in however much detail you want to. Example:
-----
"I'd fight the horses, because..."
-----
You can only respond to someone else's post after you've made your own pubic declaration. If you critique someone else's response before posting your own (you can do it all in the same post if you want) I'll kill that post. No critiquing unless you're willing to hold your own opinion up for criticism. As always, keep it civil.
To spice it up, feel free to add a humorous stereotypical military-related response as well, such as:
AC130 pilot: "Duck. Fewer squirters."
SF: <trains insurgent horses to lead an uprising against evil repressive duck overlord>
Marine: "Hold my beer." <gets drunk, strips naked, rides the duck into battle against the horses>
Ranger: "I'll fight all of them. I don't give a f#$k. RLTW!!"
SEAL #1: "You pick; my book contract will be the same amount regardless."
SEAL #2: "I wouldn't fight either, but I'd write a book about it to make everyone think I did, and then I'd start a company called SOFREP."
I'm going to write an article based on the responses and I'll post it here when it's done.