United States & Gun Control discussion.

I'm just going to ask straight up - why in the actual fuck does Canadian government hate their citizens and their desire to enjoy freedom so much?
If you want people to abandon the coldness of rugged individualism and embrace the warmth of collectivism, or whatever, you have to take their guns first.
 
As opposed to America's Far Left and their love of freedom for everyone?

If you want people to abandon the coldness of rugged individualism and embrace the warmth of collectivism, or whatever, you have to take their guns first.

Americas far left LOVES freedom for everyone - Hamas, MS13, Drag Queens, Houthis, Illegal Aliens, Female Chinese Spies, Drag Kings...
...they just don't love YOUR freedom
...you seem to be more of the dirty profiteering capitalist type that doesn't really sell their narrative

I on the other hand prefer the warmth and collectiveness of individual ruggedism.
 
Americas far left LOVES freedom for everyone - Hamas, MS13, Drag Queens, Houthis, Illegal Aliens, Female Chinese Spies, Drag Kings...
...they just don't love YOUR freedom
...you seem to be more of the dirty profiteering capitalist type that doesn't really sell their narrative

I on the other hand prefer the warmth and collectiveness of individual ruggedism.
The Canadian Left follow the same playbook. Except they are further along. The current Prime Minister and many members of his party are blatantly compromised by the CCP, Muslim Brotherhood, IRGC, Khalistani "indepence" movement, Antifa, Trans Tits for All and any throw in and other extremist or mentally ill group you can think of.
 
Last edited:
Old Dominion University gunman ID’d as former National Guardsman convicted of plotting attack to support ISIS



Cheers Thumbs Up GIF by VadooTV

Something I am interested in watching.
 
Last edited:
I got that email the other day as well. Its a really great deal but I just bought a comparable Christensen Arms bolt gun in 7 RM over the Christmas Holidays.

I wish the SA deal included a .30-06 option. - I'd gladly dump the money to have a Springfield Rifle chambered in .30-06 Springfield and could probably talk mama into NOT being mad about buying "another" bolt gun.

They do have some pretty nice options though - and it's a good strategy - for the cost of a 2020, giving away a 10mm XD-M is still going to net them some profit while thinning the factory inventory on a reliable pistol that just isn't selling very well.

Plus - when you can carry a reliable 10mm pistol into the same woods that you'd go into with a .300 PRC or .300 WM - the price for both guns can't be beat !!
 
Well now...

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) introduced the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act, legislation that extends federal concealed carry authority to both serving and veteran special operations forces whose firearms training and marksmanship standards match or exceed those of retired law enforcement officers.

"Federal law already trusts retired police officers to carry concealed nationwide. That makes sense. But it makes no sense that an active or retired SEAL or Green Beret, someone who spent a career mastering firearms under the most demanding conditions in the world, has no equivalent recognition under federal law," said Congressman Harrigan. "This bill fixes that. It does not create new rights or weaken any safeguard. It simply extends an existing, proven framework to the warriors who have earned it more than anyone."

Congressman Pat Harrigan Introduces the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act to Extend Concealed Carry Rights to Elite Military Veterans
 
Would this be for all to include non operators? Many of them non operators support are not highly trained shooters.
Nope. They specifically state what duty positions qualify for it.

“(h) Qualified special operator.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualified special operator’ means a current or former military service member with a most recent paygrade of E5–E9, W1–W5 or O1–O10 with a DD–214 or military service record that confirms service in one or more of the following roles:

“(1) Service in the United States Army Special Forces as—

“(A) a Special Forces detachment commander;
“(B) a Special Forces detachment warrant officer;
“(C) a Special Forces weapons sergeant;
“(D) an Special Forces engineer sergeant;
“(E) a Special Forces medical sergeant;
“(F) a Special Forces communications sergeant;
“(G) a Special Forces intelligence sergeant; or
“(H) a Special Forces operations sergeant.

“(2) Service in the United States Army 75th Ranger Regiment as—

“(A) an infantry officer;
“(B) an infantryman;
“(C) an indirect fire infantryman;
“(D) an infantry senior sergeant; or
“(E) a combat medic specialist.

“(3) Service in the United States Navy SEALs as—

“(A) an officer qualified in special warfare; or
“(B) an enlisted member who served as a special warfare operator.

“(4) Service in the United States Marine Corps as—

“(A) a scout sniper;
“(B) a reconnaissance marine;
“(C) a sniper qualified reconnaissance marine;
“(D) a parachute and combatant diver qualified reconnaissance marine;
“(E) a special operations officer; or
“(F) a critical skills operator.

“(5) Service in the United States Air Force as—

“(A) a member who served in combat control;
“(B) a member who served in pararescue;
“(C) a member who served in special reconnaissance;
“(D) a member who served as a tactical air control party airman; or
“(E) a member who served as a special operations weather technician.

“(6) Service in the U.S. Army 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment Delta with enlisted skill qualification identifier ‘T’.

Seems like there are some weird omissions. A combat medic assigned to 75th qualifies, but a combat engineer doesn't?
Section 6 is weird too, because you'd think some direct support roles like RTO/medic would be included.
 
Back
Top