- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 202
My personal opinion lands me with the Glock 27.
The reasons are: The .40 Smith round has good terminal performance- about as good as a .45 and better than a 9mm. The weapon is SIMPLE. You don't have to attain a certain grip, flip any levers before you can shoot, or keep your thumb on a safety to keep it from accidentally activating while you're fighting for your life. It's accurate. It's polymer, so sweat doesn't corrode it like some prettier guns. It's relatively small, but still large enough to have a full size grip. It has a greater mag capacity than a .45. The .40 Smith is a relatively common round these days, so ammo should be readily available. The recoil is much more manageable than a .357 Sig. Holsters are easy to come by, due to the commonality of the Glock pistols. It's not nearly as expensive as other pistols that many times end up being far more problematic. It's ugly, which I like. It comes ready to rock, right out of the box, unlike so many others that seem to require frequent tweaking. The slide is nice and flat, which makes getting a sight picture quick and easy. But most of all, it's RELIABLE. Bang instead of click, every time. I especially like that.
If you don't believe the Glock is more reliable than most other pistols, try this test that John Shaw demonstrated for us back when the Glocks first came out: Take 2 pistols, bury them in the dirt. Jump up and down on them, cycle a round, attempt to fire. If you're willing to get some pistols dirty and you try this a few times, you'll have your answer. So much for the pretty and expensive guns.
The reasons are: The .40 Smith round has good terminal performance- about as good as a .45 and better than a 9mm. The weapon is SIMPLE. You don't have to attain a certain grip, flip any levers before you can shoot, or keep your thumb on a safety to keep it from accidentally activating while you're fighting for your life. It's accurate. It's polymer, so sweat doesn't corrode it like some prettier guns. It's relatively small, but still large enough to have a full size grip. It has a greater mag capacity than a .45. The .40 Smith is a relatively common round these days, so ammo should be readily available. The recoil is much more manageable than a .357 Sig. Holsters are easy to come by, due to the commonality of the Glock pistols. It's not nearly as expensive as other pistols that many times end up being far more problematic. It's ugly, which I like. It comes ready to rock, right out of the box, unlike so many others that seem to require frequent tweaking. The slide is nice and flat, which makes getting a sight picture quick and easy. But most of all, it's RELIABLE. Bang instead of click, every time. I especially like that.
If you don't believe the Glock is more reliable than most other pistols, try this test that John Shaw demonstrated for us back when the Glocks first came out: Take 2 pistols, bury them in the dirt. Jump up and down on them, cycle a round, attempt to fire. If you're willing to get some pistols dirty and you try this a few times, you'll have your answer. So much for the pretty and expensive guns.