There are about 20 different ways I can go with this, but I'll keep it to a few of the more persuasive reasons:Serious question JBS how is it unethical to leverage a crises with an agenda? That seems to me like the best time to do so. No sarcasm here serious question.
In 2005, pre-Iraq surge and all that, the DoD used 1.3 billion rounds of 5.56 and 81 million rounds of 9mm. Iraq, train-ups, Basic, annual qualifications, etc...1.3 billion rounds of 5.56 alone.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05687.pdf
If she did claim it, she'd be correct. Americans have stockpiled and purchased weapons and ammo at what some would call an alarming rate, according to every stat I've come across on the topic. I've heard the same joke from gun dealers and pawn brokers over and over again, "Obama is the best gun salesman the firearms industry has ever had". But I would rather live in a situation where the government fears the people, rather than a situation where the people fear the government. Thanks to the agenda of those in power, we are living in a time of unprecedented lack of trust between the government and the people.
Consider: there are TV shows now that have made "prepping" something just shy of mainstream. And although the focus of these shows is usually something about preparing for catastrophes and disasters, there are also frequent shows about how to deal with martial law, etc. What does it say about the average state of mind of the American people when you can't even buy ammo in Wal Mart or Bass Pro Shops anymore? This is a state of distrust. And on the government side, it's no better. We have seen a steady trickle of reports and various kinds of memos and alerts, warning Law Enforcement of the dangers posed by US military veterans, people flying the Gadsen flag, people buying military surplus gear, and anyone who talks just a little too much about the US Constitution. I mean, what kind of Twilight Zone BS is that? We've also seen the SPLC grow ever more influential in many law enforcement circles and frequently referring to the dangers posed by white conservative gun owners.
Yet despite the culprit for today's tension clearly being the state of mistrust between government and the population, the response of this Administration has been to do things like pursue further gun control, redact government reports on the numbers of ammo and equipment acquisitions, and to speak in hushed tones about how they will pursue influencing domestic policy outside of overt channels. I refer to when The President was quoted as saying he would pursue gun control "under the radar", as well as his complete embrace of radical Leftist political strategy. Namely, the unethical idea of leveraging and capitalizing on whatever domestic crisis happens to emerge in order to advance the agenda:
I can tell you the effect on me.... rifle rounds $33/box and pistol rounds $25/box... at a gun show.
A couple months back I made a statement at work about how this administration has inadvertantly succeeded in putting more guns in the hands of citizens than any other administration that I can think of. Not that it is a bad thing, but what bothers me are the numbers of people who are buying guns and have no idea how to use them and fail to put forth any effort to do so. I foresee a large number of legally purchased firearms finding their way from legal ownership to illegal in the next five or so years due to some folks lack of willing to be responsible gun owners.
Sorry to resurrect this thread, but the facts regarding the ammo deal (and the fabled 2,700 MRAPs that were reportedly purchased) seem to have come up while the discussion was on going, but were never posted for some reason.
BLUF: DHS purchased a few hundred million rounds over a 5-year timeline, and only got 32 MRAPs (from the DoD). The 2,700 MRAP order was for the Marine Corps.
Ammo: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-Stockpile-Myth (I can't believe I'm linking to a freaking Breitbart article, but it conclusively puts this topic to bed)
MRAPs: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/art..._Obama_DHS_Purchases_2700_Light-Armored_Tanks
http://www.businessinsider.com/homeland-security-serving-warrants-mrap-2013-3
When shit was crazy in NY with the preban buy up, I witnessed a lot of these idiots.
Customer. "I want to buy an AR15!"
Gun Guy. "OK, which one?"
C "That one"
G "Sure"
C "What does it do?"
G "Huh?"
C "What can I shoot with it?"
G "Uhh, what do you want it for?"
C "Personal defense, CQB, long range target shooting, duck hunting, moose hunting, rodent control, and the zombie apocalypse."
G "Give me $2500 and GTFO"
C "How dare you! I'm thinking about becoming a member of the NRA!"
G "Ch-Ching!"
Ever since Breitbart turned up dead at age 43 of a heart attack and his media operations taken over by Shapiro, they've taken a left-turn politically in the company's views and broken zero news damaging to the Left. Breitbart is no longer what it was and their "definitive debunking" of anything is worthless.Sorry to resurrect this thread, but the facts regarding the ammo deal (and the fabled 2,700 MRAPs that were reportedly purchased) seem to have come up while the discussion was on going, but were never posted for some reason.
BLUF: DHS purchased a few hundred million rounds over a 5-year timeline, and only got 32 MRAPs (from the DoD). The 2,700 MRAP order was for the Marine Corps.
Ammo: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-Stockpile-Myth (I can't believe I'm linking to a freaking Breitbart article, but it conclusively puts this topic to bed)
MRAPs: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/art..._Obama_DHS_Purchases_2700_Light-Armored_Tanks
http://www.businessinsider.com/homeland-security-serving-warrants-mrap-2013-3
Ever since Breitbart turned up dead at age 43 of a heart attack and his media operations taken over by Shapiro, they've taken a left-turn politically in the company's views and broken zero news damaging to the Left. Breitbart is no longer what it was and their "definitive debunking" of anything is worthless.
We're talking about an organization that once forced the resignation of Shirley Sherrod after the ACORN scandal (which subsequently led to the defunding of that once supremely influential organization). Breitbart died of a sudden heart attack a day or two after meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio where they were discussing how best to approach the Obama Birth Certificate fraud investigation. When Breitbart turned up dead and Shapiro moved in, the FIRST thing he (Shapiro) did is cut ALL Breitbart media ties to the Arpaio Birth Certificate investigation and make all sorts of statements about how this matter would no longer be pursued and that there was no evidence of fraud, despite Andrew Brietbart's conviction that there was. With his death, Andrew Breitbart's life work of exposing the most obscenely corrupt and complicated conspiracies came to an abrupt and permanent end.
Shapiro has been really good at mocking the views and suspicions of concerned citizens as "quackery" and "tin foil hattery". Every modern American generation has had their Shapiros. In the 1950's and 60's, they came out of the woodwork and tell the American people how silly a notion it would be for the government to do any such heinous thing as infect black US Army soldiers with syphilis and gonorrhea on purpose, or experiment with LSD on civilians... and many other ignoble and misguided (and criminal) behaviors.
Breitbart media is nothing like what it once was.
I don't get what's so funny about mocking concerned citizens. Stockpiling ammo is happening, and so is the militarization of domestic police forces in this country.
I don't know what fucking bubble people are living in but this nation has changed-and for the worse- and no amount of mocking and jokes is going to change that. I'm old enough to remember life before things got this bad.
Who is "us"? Do you refer to yourself in the majestic 3rd person or do you mean a little Shadowspear clique you feel you belong to? Not good or healthy for the board my friend.@JBS tell us honestly: do you think Andrew Breitbart was murdered?