I think the Chinese are worried that ethnically dissimilar provinces, like Xijiang; Tibet; yanbian; and Inner Mongolia,may strike for their independence one day.
This is spot on.
I think the Chinese are worried that ethnically dissimilar provinces, like Xijiang; Tibet; yanbian; and Inner Mongolia,may strike for their independence one day.
Sorry Brothers it gets better, same Writer posted this 4 hours ago. Found checking my link in an post in this thread.
‘You’re on your own’: US sealift can’t count on US Navy escorts in the next big war.
I think the Chinese are worried that ethnically dissimilar provinces, like Xijiang; Tibet; yanbian; and Inner Mongolia,may strike for their independence one day.
Bazinga! The rulers of China, whatever their persuasion over time, have been concerned about internal disunity & this drives the PRC policy towards not only those you mention but also Hong Kong & Taiwan, which the mainland considers rebel provinces which should be brought back into the fold.I think the Chinese are worried that ethnically dissimilar provinces, like Xijiang; Tibet; yanbian; and Inner Mongolia,may strike for their independence one day.
I don’t know...Russia tried that in a number of places and it didn’t work.Yes and that's why they have their colonisation program to introduce Han to the areas. These will eventually outnumber the local minority and is another reason why I don't think ethnic separatism is going to be too much of an issue for the PRC.
Recent events are troubling to say the least. You can love or hate Russia but you can’t ignore them.You don’t always get to pick your battlefield. China is the bigger threat but Russia is more belligerent. Hopefully we are all wrong.
I don’t know...Russia tried that in a number of places and it didn’t work.
Of course. I only meant that it didn’t keep these former Soviet republics from breaking off. Russia isn’t afraid to roll tanks over the border to impose their will on their neighbors but I think China likes to be more subtle than that.What it did do for them, though, is to give them a later claim to areas that they wanted to annex... like eastern Georgia, Crimea, eastern Ukraine... if your country can afford to be patient, seeding territory you want to possess with people who look like you and speak your language could be a successful long-term strategy.
Of course. I only meant that it didn’t keep these former Soviet republics from breaking off. Russia isn’t afraid to roll tanks over the border to impose their will on their neighbors but I think China likes to be more subtle than that.
Yeah, the Rangers can be anywhere in 24 hours, the 82nd less than that, the Marines, even less than that in many places, but none of those can hold out without quick resupply and massive reinforcement.
LOLWUT
Reverse thatWeren't they supposed to be deployable in 18 hours or something like that? I don't know, you tell me.
I am okay being wrong. My wife tells me all the time.
If war broke out in Europe, there is a high chance our allies would be too tied up in the fight or be fully combat ineffective due to loses. Help is great but at the end of the day we need to know whether or not we can do it on our own.Doesn't this take completely ignore the logistical support that the US would have from France and Germany?
At the beginning I don't think we'd have much logistical support from them. We would be the ones supplying logistical support to them across an ocean before we could mass our forces and conduct operations. As @DasBoot mentions above they would be focused on fighting the fight before they'd attempt to provide logistical support.Doesn't this take completely ignore the logistical support that the US would have from France and Germany?
Other than facilities what support would we get from Europe?Doesn't this take completely ignore the logistical support that the US would have from France and Germany?