Best OPORD contest

[mike_cos]

I'm thinking to post here a WARNO... (don't worry... it's fake...) with all possible infos for you to create your personal OPORD to submit to SS. Best OPORD will win a BlackOp...
Admin this could be non-conforming OPSEC/PERSEC rules?

 

[0699]

Faulty porkupines FIDO bumpkins english-speaking frog jump seven Fred left.

 

[mike_cos]

Roger

 

[x SF med]

Faulty porkupines FIDO bumpkins english-speaking frog jump seven Fred left.

Hike.

 

[mike_cos]

Hike.

oh... I love hiking...

 

[Marauder06]

I think it's a good idea. I don't think an OPORD based on a fictitious scenario would be likely to run afoul of OPSEC.

Then again, the support guys would whip the operations guys' asses in OPORD writing anyway, so maybe it's not worth the time.

 

[mike_cos]

I think it's a good idea. I don't think an OPORD based on a fictitious scenario would be likely to run afoul of OPSEC.

Then again, the support guys would whip the operations guys' asses in OPORD writing anyway, so maybe it's not worth the time.

well.... very well.... WARNO incoming...

 

[Marauder06]

Just send it to the enablers... none of the ops guys can write coherently anyway.

 

[mike_cos]

Just send it to the enablers... none of the ops guys can write coherently anyway.

what you mean?....

 

[SpitfireV]

We had moved to the mil format briefings/opords when I first started but they hadn't bothered to tell the people already working there. Queue a bunch of "why is he repeating himself all the time?" "what's with the unnecessary 'not applicable' repeated twice?" I quite liked the format, it's very logical but I think both sides of the briefing room needed a bit of training!

 

[x SF med]

Ah, Hell... I have to remember a 5 paragraph field order?
Situation
Mission
Maneuver
Actions at the objective
Command and Signal

kinda crap?

I don't know if I'm gonna play.

 

[Marauder06]

I think it's situation, mission, execution, service and support, command and signal. At least that's what I remember it being back when I actually did them.

 

[0699]

I think it's situation, mission, execution, service and support, command and signal. At least that's what I remember it being back when I actually did them.

I thought it was Situation, Mission, Execution, Administration & Logistics, Command & Signal... :confused:

 

[AWP]

I think it is also, www.google.com

Mara's is how I was taught, but I wouldn't be surprised if each service had their own method. Except the AF....

 

[Teufel]

This sounds about as fun as doing a Basic Skills Test.

 

[mike_cos]

I see that I slightly stimulated interest... please wait for WARNO (this evening)... today I have very dangerous op... (go out with my wife and 2 sons...)...

P.S. : BOON!!!! damn... I'm addicted to SS! Stop subliminal messages!

 

[amlove21]

I think it is also, www.google.com

Mara's is how I was taught, but I wouldn't be surprised if each service had their own method. Except the AF....

Hey hey hey, if it ain't broke, and you can steal it and relabel your initials on it, then it was ALWAYS yours, right?

Don't know if you gents ever heard of it, but there is this book called the "Ranger Handbook". Pretty useful! It lists the OPORD as Situation, Mission, Execution, Service and Support, Command and Signal. And for the record, yes, we use that format and didn't come up with our own.

 

[AWP]

LOL

Ranger Handbook? News to me.....

 

[Headshot]

Ah, Hell... I have to remember a 5 paragraph field order?
Situation
Mission
Maneuver
Actions at the objective
Command and Signal

kinda crap?

I don't know if I'm gonna play.

This SMMACK's of acronyms too much for my enjoyment.

All of our actions at the objective were pretty much the same, walk through the smoking heap of rubble and go make another one somewhere else.

 

[x SF med]

Ok, so I threw a few sub paragraphs in there from lack of use... sue me... start at the end of the mission and plan to current time... SSDD,