What plan?
Covid-19
- Thread starter Ooh-Rah
- Start date
I'm very interested in this plan as well. You first post in this thread was very "COVID is a way for the New World Order to happen" (with references to the Clintons, Epstein, and McCain and ISIS).
Is that what you're talking about?
Also, please link us something to show where you're getting this info. As much as I might disagree with some members of this board on the reg, I can at least respect their position when they actually provide something to see what they're talking about.
Kraut783
SOF Support
How is it a cherry pick? this thread has been critical of the WHO from their close relationship to China and their guidance from the beginning.
Juggrnaut
Unverified
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
- Messages
- 41
I understand the comment about wanting evidence, but really google searching and watching the events over the last few months as the WHO, CDC, government and other parties have been called out, admitted and stated a lot of what I’ve already said/eluded to.
As far as the WHO cover up,
China, WHO could have helped prevent COVID-19 pandemic: congressional report
Pick any media and it will state something similar. The radical details are irrelevant from some of the other outlets, but the general consensus is the WHO helped China cover it up and delay action. There’s a few reports even from German intelligence and others about it. Not to mention that Virologist who defected mentions it as well.
as far as “the plan”, that would take forever to type out. The general idea is it’s an attack on the US from the communists. Everything is deliberate, and moves us a step closer to “equilibrium” for lack of a better reference.
I will search for the video, as YouTube and other media ban/delete anything speaking out against what I’m talking about. But there were very high prominent leaders, scientists, bankers, etc etc on tv in interviews or seminars or addresses to the nation literally stating, and I quote “ we need to use covid as the catalyst for the new world order” among many many more references to new world order esk, Marxist ideology, utopia.
It's a cherry pick because all through this thread has been a recurring topic of "oh my how the WHO sucks" (which I don't necessarily disagree with) but now that something confirms a bias it's suddenly an organisation to be trusted.
I haven’t seen anything that says “Trust the WHO,” so much as a combination of “Took ya long enough to come around,” and “Blind squirrel, meet nut. We hope you still starve.”
Florida173
SOF Support
Sorry man but no one is suddenly trusting the organization here.
Please anyone responding to this thread tell me if I'm wrong and that you now trust the WHO as @SpitfireV suggests
ThunderHorse
Verified Military
Sure that Article doesn't but we have hundreds of posts in this thread. I've previously posted links showing the WHO changed their stance. Here's another one.
WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns
________________
I don't know about a new world order. But during this period the Beijing government has fully eroded the one country two-systems deal that was executed when Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule. And the West has barely said a thing. We've said stuff, removed Hong Kong's special status. But the realness? The Chinese putting millions of their own people in labor camps because they hold a certain faith during this period of time where the West has been responding stupidly to a virus that is a very limited threat.
Last edited:
Juggrnaut
Unverified
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
- Messages
- 41
They also have over a million Muslim (I believe they’re called Weegars? Or something close to that) slaves in China. Lot of sketchy stuff going around and this plandemic, like the gladiatorial games of Rome, is a nice distraction. I believe there was a 1 billion dollar deal with Hunter and Joe Biden with China, plus the Ukraine scandal. The list is laundry with things trying to be suppressed right now.
Thanks for that info, I hadn’t heard about that.
I agree. I don't see anyone here saying they trust the WHO, but confirming what we all thought from the beginning...it's all bullshit.
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 607
It would probably make sense not to use that article to deliver that point, then.
I've asked you some version of this question before, and now I'll ask again: Do you even check what you post as evidence before throwing it up?
You literally posted news.com.au's edition of the same lead story you just admitted doesn't demonstrate the WHO's alleged backpedaling.
ThunderHorse
Verified Military
No, my comment was a general one. And the WHO has not been consistent with messaging at all. You seem to think they haven't changed their stance massively. That's fine and all but not the case. As has been stated by many here. The WHO is full of shit.
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 607
... So, no?
Good to go.
Also, Happy Columbus Day.
Good to go.
Also, Happy Columbus Day.
ThunderHorse
Verified Military
This was published and only a certain side seems to be talking about it. Masks (cloth masks) under this small study basically don't work. 
It's on page 4 of this Morbity and Mortality weekly report. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69...BgylZyeQfzt8dcz1OEqHTl0NOPTDwcYNmtIz2hztcLREs
Was published now a month ago. Probably some good reading for @Devildoc to come back and compare to what he's seeing on the ground.
ETA: Harvard folks at Mass General saying that once you've been infected you have lasting immunity. Article published on the 8th [OCT], also got no time in the "media."
COVID survivors may have four months of protection
Study link- Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients | Science Immunology
It's on page 4 of this Morbity and Mortality weekly report. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69...BgylZyeQfzt8dcz1OEqHTl0NOPTDwcYNmtIz2hztcLREs
Was published now a month ago. Probably some good reading for @Devildoc to come back and compare to what he's seeing on the ground.
ETA: Harvard folks at Mass General saying that once you've been infected you have lasting immunity. Article published on the 8th [OCT], also got no time in the "media."
COVID survivors may have four months of protection
Study link- Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients | Science Immunology
Last edited:
It sounds like refried QAnon.
Juggrnaut
Unverified
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
- Messages
- 41
I don’t follow Q, and I understand the skepticism. However, when BLM’s website states their Marxist and they have the support they do, major gov officials like Pelosi are attacking the constitution in favor of Marxist ideology, the media and Hollywood pedaling Marxism, Antifa, leftists and rioters promoting Marxism, sketchy backwoods deals from the Dems with... communists, Major world leaders literally referencing Marxism and utopian new world order, it’s not even conspiracy theory, it’s being said in public in front of masses, and they aren’t Alex Jones types. The list goes on and on.
It’s also funny that anytime someone posts a video of it on social media, it’s deleted and/or they’re banned.
On a side note, even though I don’t follow Q, I find it odd that they’re going through so much trouble to silence him/her for “conspiracy” related issues when people like Alex Jones and others state the same shit and have done it for longer... Congress is literally trying to pass legislation on it. That’s not normal, plus it’s an attack on free speech so, not only is it bullshit, it’s high brow questionable at the least.
Mate I think you need a few days away from the internet.
I'm curious why you have two accounts.
Juggrnaut
Unverified
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2020
- Messages
- 41
Few reasons. I wanted to put the account to a different email, As I wanted to become more involved in the community, receiving emails to my primary account, with the already obnoxious amount of emails I get from amazon and every other site, I didn’t want to miss conversations I was involved in.
I felt my username was a poor choice, I had logged in to post a clip for someone and felt it reflected badly and I hadn’t seen till after I made my new account the thread about the ability to change it once every 6 months. I plan on deleting the account as it’s not needed and I apologize if this caused an issue.
I have been doing extensive research for years, picking my friends brains on SF. I had begun to train and put my effort into prepping for the journey but (insert long story of my crazy ex getting pregnant on purpose and my 2 year court battle) my son was born. The age limit was 32 and people had stated getting a waiver was meh. So I began looking into other options, and I found CCT in the ANG, who’s age limit was 39. Recently, however, the age limit of SF was raised to 35, so it became an option again. Since I had only made like 2 posts, and I was already planning on reworking my account, I used the same details so that way I was still me and could again pursue my goal of SF.
I apologize if I should have stated i had the other account or something, again I was going to delete it.
