F 
		
				
			
		Firosche
Guest
I am debating what to get for a new duty weapon.  This is for Law Enforcement.  We are allowed to choose any pistol that is 9mm or bigger.  I personally like the 40 cal S&W.  Any suggestions?
				
			Yeah tax time will help out, not to mention th stimulus package aka buy a gun fund.
Yeah, I already earmarked that check for another pistol. ;)
I am debating what to get for a new duty weapon. This is for Law Enforcement. We are allowed to choose any pistol that is 9mm or bigger. I personally like the 40 cal S&W. Any suggestions?
 So I could make payments if I wanted to and he would let me take it and qualify with it and then return it till it was paid off.  Kind a cool deal.:cool:  But all in all I will have to go and shoot a couple and see which one I like most.  They all have their pros:) and cons:doh:.  Thanks for all the input.  Keep them coming;).
  So I could make payments if I wanted to and he would let me take it and qualify with it and then return it till it was paid off.  Kind a cool deal.:cool:  But all in all I will have to go and shoot a couple and see which one I like most.  They all have their pros:) and cons:doh:.  Thanks for all the input.  Keep them coming;).
However you could just go out and buy one and if you dont like it afterwards I'll give you a good price for it as a used gun
I would buy all the USPs I could get. I absolutely love that weapon... and I carry 49 rounds of ammo wherever I go. 16X3+1....
There is no compromise with the HK, as their trade mark states...
Good luck and let me know what you do
HK USP FTW!!!:)
It seems that a lot of you like the H&K USP. I have also got a few good reviews on the glock. It seems to be a toss up between the glock, USP, and sig 226. If any of you had the choice between these three weapons to put your life on, which one would it be? This is a all out serious question.
 This negates the departments from actually training their officers on tactical pistol proficiency. The mindset seems to be that if they have to train their officers on a safety system it will cost more and take more range time.
 This negates the departments from actually training their officers on tactical pistol proficiency. The mindset seems to be that if they have to train their officers on a safety system it will cost more and take more range time.  I guess they think a safety on the trigger is actually a safety.
 I guess they think a safety on the trigger is actually a safety. 
It seems that a lot of you like the H&K USP. I have also got a few good reviews on the glock. It seems to be a toss up between the glock, USP, and sig 226. If any of you had the choice between these three weapons to put your life on, which one would it be? This is a all out serious question.
