MREs not providing adequate nutrition

Negative......humvees will carry them. It gets worse...more than a few are complaining about having no heat in the tents haha....

If it's no heat in Afghanistan in the winter, I'd complain too! :eek:
Good piece from the Chicago Tribune

I thought I would post this up, I almost missed it from Sunday's edition. A couple of the passages I've highlighted in bold italics.

Field rations letting U.S. troops down

By Aamer Madhani
Tribune national correspondent
Published March 25, 2007

NATICK, Mass. -- When Lt. Dave Moore visited infantry units in the remote, rugged mountains of Afghanistan late last year, the Navy medical officer was surprised to hear from many soldiers and Marines that they had lost significant weight.

After conducting more than 150 interviews with medics, officers and troops on the ground, Moore concluded that the portable rations called "Meals, Ready-to-Eat"--long derided by troops, but valued by the Pentagon for their indestructibility--were not doing the job, causing the soldiers to shed pounds that they very much needed.

"The standard Meal, Ready to Eat (MRE) does not provide adequate nutrition for dismounted operations in this type of terrain," said an excerpt of Moore's classified report, which was released by the Marine Corps Center for Lessons Learned. "Many Marines and soldiers lost 20 to 40 pounds of bodyweight during their deployment. At least one soldier was evacuated due to malnutrition and a 60-pound weight loss."

Moore's conclusions have raised concern among military leaders, as well as designers of the field rations at the Natick Soldier Research, Development & Engineering Center outside Boston.

Moore stressed in an interview that the service members he surveyed represented only a small portion of those fighting in Afghanistan--infantry troops deployed to desolate locations where MREs and local cuisine were the only options--but nonetheless he concluded that up to 1,300-calorie MREs were falling short.

A nutrition deficit, he added, could potentially result in fatigue, impaired brain function and lackluster performance.

Recognizing reports of weight loss are serious, the Combat Feeding Directorate is planning to ship about 4,000 prototypes of a new meal called the First Strike Ration to Iraq and Afghanistan. Designed for limited use, the ration contains about twice the calories of an MRE.

The U.S. military has used technology to pinpoint targets with smart bombs, and it can deploy thousands of warriors to a flash point within days. But feeding troops well at the tip of the spear remains one of the most elusive tasks for the U.S. war machine.

While mess halls in Afghanistan and Iraq provide the troops at bases three square meals a day, soldiers on the front lines often subsist for long stretches on MREs. These include entrees processed at high temperatures and kept in air-sealed pouches to maintain a shelf life of three years. Other typical components include dehydrated beverage mixes and snacks like peanut butter, crackers and nuts. Dietitians recommend soldiers eat three MREs a day.

At the small military installation in Natick, food scientists and dietitians with the Combat Feeding Directorate, which designs the MREs, acknowledged that weight loss among the troops has become an issue.

Dr. Andrew Young, a researcher at the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine at Natick, said his agency has begun collecting data on the weight of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has already found anecdotal evidence that service members, particularly those in Afghanistan, are losing 20 to 35 pounds on their deployments.

Much of the problem is caused by heavy packaging, Young said. Troops on dismounted patrols often "field-strip" their bulky MRE packs, bringing along only part of the meals, to reduce the weight of their rucksacks and save room for cargo such as ammunition. In the process, they throw away calories, Young said.

"The MRE is designed to provide the caloric needs of the largest percentage of war fighters," he said. "The issue is operational constraints that are imposed on the warriors that prevent them from consuming the optimal calories."

Moore agreed that field-stripping is a problem, but he also blamed bland food and menus that don't meet the needs for high-intensity fighting.

"The MRE doesn't provide enough calories," Moore said in a telephone interview from the Mountain Warfare Training Center in Bridgeport, Calif. "If you're in the mountains, you need 4,500 calories a day. Even if a soldier eats everything in the MRE, which they rarely do, they're going to be running deficient of calories, and over a period of time they're going to lose weight."

High-altitude environments can cause anorexia, but Moore said the troops he spoke with had acclimated. The military has higher-calorie rations available for long-range and cold-weather patrols, but they are significantly more expensive and are not widely distributed.

The MRE, which costs the Defense Department about $7.25 per meal, was introduced in 1980 with a dozen different menus, including a few that soldiers deemed inedible, such as Smoky Franks, which soldiers called the Four Fingers of Death, or Chicken a la King, which was known as Chicken a la Death.

`Meals Refused by Everyone'

When the MRE went to war in the early 1990s, it fared little better with troops on the ground in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq, who derisively referred to the rations as Meals Refused by Everyone.

The MRE developed such a poor reputation that former Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell ordered it overhauled. In 1995, the National Academy of Sciences found that troops were under-consuming their rations by 1,000 calories per day.

"It's not necessarily true, the old adage that they'll eat anything if they're hungry enough," said Gerald Darsch, who heads the Combat Feeding Directorate. "They may eat something if they're hungry enough, but they might not eat the right things." Troops in the field, Darsch added, will often bypass MREs for salty or sugary snacks they purchase at the PX or receive from home.

In recent years, the designers of the MRE have focused more on soldiers' tastes, using menus of restaurants in base towns across the country as guideposts. Soldiers like spicier foods, and there is a greater demand for ethnic entrees, said Judith Aylward, a senior food technologist with the Combat Feeding Directorate. So the directorate introduced such items as chicken fajitas and jambalaya and is soon hoping to roll out a buffalo chicken entree.

Each year, food scientists, nutritionists and dietitians from Natick head out with a unit in field training to test new menus. They ask the troops what they like, and they literally "Dumpster dive" to see what was eaten and what was thrown away.

Aylward and a colleague recalled that some of the test rations they were certain would be winners--stuffed cabbage and shepherd's pie--flopped when brought out to the field.

Aylward said producing items with a long shelf life remains the biggest hurdle.

"The items we hear they want the most are pizza and breakfast foods," Aylward said. "We can't produce a shelf-stable pizza, and the retort [high-temperature processing] affects the color and consistency of the egg dishes."

Seeking to address the weight-loss problem, the directorate is planning on widespread distribution of the First Strike Ration by this fall. Unlike the MRE, it requires no heating.

It includes a shelf-stable sandwich, and its various components contain more carbohydrates, protein and caffeine. The First Strike Ration, about a half-pound heavier than the MRE, is smaller and contains about 2,500 calories. But the ration is only meant to be consumed for three consecutive days, according to rules set by the Army surgeon general.

C. Patrick Dunne, a senior adviser to the Combat Feeding Directorate, said it is inevitable that troops will eat too little in the field, adding that the First Strike Ration has been fine-tuned to minimize weight loss and slow the impact on performance for troops.

Dunne added that strides are being made in high-pressure processing that could improve the tastes of certain foods.

In the meantime, Dunne said tweaks need to be made in diets of soldiers working in highly demanding situations.

Optimized carbs

"What can we do ... to compensate for the fact that over a period of time we know the [troops] are going to be under-consuming?" Dunne said. "We optimized the carbohydrates to keep the brain functioning, and we optimized the proteins so you don't degrade the muscle mass."

Moore, the Navy doctor who reported that troops in Afghanistan are losing weight, said he is looking forward to the rollout of the First Strike Ration. The situation could be improved, Moore added, if scientists could figure out how to make the chow more palatable.

"If I were going to design the perfect MRE for austere conditions, I'd put more carbohydrates in them and try to improve the taste, which I know is hard to do," Moore said. "The people at Natick have done an awesome job with the MREs. They're so much better than when I started in the early 1990s. But we know that guys eat more and drink more when something tastes good."

The Tribune food critic wrote a sidebar piece accompanying this article, and the various MRE food items he reviewed failed miserably. I'm going to send him an e-mail outlining my own MRE horror story.
do you have a weblink for that Tribune sidebar....or the website for the publication?
The First Strike Ration, about a half-pound heavier than the MRE, is smaller and contains about 2,500 calories. But the ration is only meant to be consumed for three consecutive days, according to rules set by the Army surgeon general.

Fat lotta good this is gonna be!


Got a bit of a laugh out of this.....I didn't realize they tasted that bad:
Our food critic's reaction: These rations are MR-ick said:
By Phil Vettel
Tribune restaurant critic
Published March 25, 2007

After forcing down just a few spoonfuls of the food they're expected to eat every day, I have an even deeper appreciation and concern for our men and women in uniform.

Small wonder our servicemen are having trouble maintaining weight, if what I tasted is representative of what they're fed in the field. This dreck could (and perhaps should) be repackaged as diet food, because, despite its high caloric content, I can't imagine anyone finishing this stuff. The MRE Diet could sweep the nation, although there might be landfill issues down the road.

I sampled two main courses and a dessert, and here are my reactions:

- Beef roast with vegetables: Absolutely awful. The meat is soggy, the vegetables have been ground into indecipherable bits (apart from the tell-tale orange of the carrot fragments) and the gravy is reminiscent of something from a can. With a wagging dog on the label.

- Penne pasta with spicy vegetable sausage: At first blush, acceptable. The pasta is predictably limp (canned supermarket pasta suffers the same fate), but the tomato sauce isn't horrendous, and some vaguely fennel-like substance has been applied to the vegetarian sausage. But the seasoning has a chemical aftertaste and, 15 minutes later, the tip of my tongue was still tingling suspiciously. Not a good sign.

- Crunchy toffee cookie: Actually good! It comes out of its protective pouch looking like an actual cookie, has a pleasantly crunchy texture and imparts discernible butter and caramel flavors. Among our troops, these crunchy treats must be worth their weight in gold.

Fat lotta good this is gonna be!

The First Strike Ration, about a half-pound heavier than the MRE, is smaller and contains about 2,500 calories. But the ration is only meant to be consumed for three consecutive days, according to rules set by the Army surgeon general.



The current regs state that a soldier should not subsist on a straight MRE diet for more than 21 days, and even then should be getting supplemented with fruit, vegetables, milk and bread.

If the current MREs are as bad as they are for regular subsistence, just how bad will these First Strike Rations be?

Of course, we all know the chain of command would never let a troop in the field go for 21 days without a decent, hot meal, much less 3 whole days.:rolleyes:
It is always going to be tough to produce a decent field ration, one that can survive the extremes that they are subjected to in various environments.

But, I think the good folks at Natick are up to the task. I would suggest they look to other solutions, other than the primary spec of having a long shelf life. Perhaps a ration that has a shorter shelf life is in order, with a better production shedule institued so that when these are needed, things can be ramped up as circumstances dictate.

Of course, these contracts are sweetheart deals to begin with. The guy that owned the company down in McCallen, TX was a heavy hitter with the Reagan Administration, and he made untold millions on the crap he produced. I always avoided the MREs from McCallen whenever possible.
Of course, these contracts are sweetheart deals to begin with. The guy that owned the company down in McCallen, TX was a heavy hitter with the Reagan Administration, and he made untold millions on the crap he produced. I always avoided the MREs from McCallen whenever possible.

How could you tell the difference?

Yea, they always had the city of origin stamped on the outside.

No date of manufacture, though. Not that it would matter, I'll bet the older MREs got better with age.

"Would you like some 10 year old peanut butter on that 12 year old cracker?" :D

I just sent a long letter to Phil Vettel, the Tribune food critic. I read his stuff all the time, I suggested to him he do a taste off and nutritional testing of various field rations produced by our various allies.

I've heard the Canadians make some pretty good stuff, and the French field rations could probably be served at most mess halls, they're that good.