National Protest and 'disband the cops' discussion (and now ICE)

At what point in time did he step in front of the vehicle?
When it was parked? or when it started to move.
Turn the steering wheel, step on the gas and boom I am suddenly in front of a moving vehicle.
I don't think he "stepped in front" of it at all. I think he was standing offset to the vehicle, most likely IAW his training, and then the suspect swerved her car in his direction, gunned the engine, and hit him with her vehicle.
 
I am not excusing or agreeing with any behavior the officer took, but I will say, if you hit me and drag me with a car performing the same sort of stop 6 months prior... I might approach that next stop a little more aggressively.

EDIT- my bad @Blizzard missed your post, thanks for posting first. My above point stands
 
So we're still ignoring why she was there in the first place, hm? She's not the victim, the victims were those officers that she had put in harm's way.

What kind of mother abandons her three children for a seditious cause? Not a good one. Not sorry but this is the only narrative that needs to be seen here. I am not going to allow a victim blaming narrative where the officers being victims of sedition gets put under the microscope for what a nefarious person had done.

Why was her vehicle in a blocking position? Why did she attempt to flee and take out anyone when she was going to be detained for obstruction?
 
More importantly- a fight or flight response “she was just trying to get away” and “the officer shouldn’t have been in front of the car”…

He wasn’t. She wasn’t. She put her car in reverse to go to her right versus her left. She has outs left; furthermore, even with *no outs* a truly panicked person with no training would have taken the left no matter the outs available. Car was already in drive- you just panic and hit the gas.

Know what she wouldn’t have done? Shift into reverse, hit brakes, shift into drive, turn wheel towards officers, hit gas. Either the argument is she’s monkey brain level or she’s not.

She wasn’t.

 
More importantly- a fight or flight response “she was just trying to get away” and “the officer shouldn’t have been in front of the car”…

He wasn’t. She wasn’t. She put her car in reverse to go to her right versus her left. She has outs left; furthermore, even with *no outs* a truly panicked person with no training would have taken the left no matter the outs available. Car was already in drive- you just panic and hit the gas.

Know what she wouldn’t have done? Shift into reverse, hit brakes, shift into drive, turn wheel towards officers, hit gas. Either the argument is she’s monkey brain level or she’s not.

She wasn’t.


For those paying attention, her wheel spins on the ice, when she points the wheels forward, look where the officer's feet are (both of them for that matter) to me both are on ice. The only reason this guy slides instead of stumbles is because he's on ice. If he wasn't on ice, who knows what we're talking about. Signed, a guy who has been hit by a car.
 
I hope if I am showing ignorance on procedures or how it works, you can forgive me, but I was wondering: given this ICE agent was run over just a short while back, was it wise to put him around vehicles again?
 
Back
Top